But if we dont win the league, Mancini has to go. He has spent fortune on quality players and to lose the league to the weakest Man u team in 10+ years who had their captain and best CB injured pretty much all season is not good enough. With going out early in all three cups, the league is the only thing that can save his job
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I hate to say it
- Thread starter Calcio
- Start date
andrewmswift
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 6,957
the weakest man u team in how many years that is doing better points wise at this stage than any of those "better" teams?
ok.
ok.
MSP
Well-Known Member
It would be big blow for both club and much more to Mancini's reputation but club doesn't become successful with changing managers each 2 years.
United would still be on Everton's levels if they did it when Ferguson missed to bring any silverware at OT in his first 4-5 years.
City needs stability and the only way to reach that is to not change managers all the time.
United would still be on Everton's levels if they did it when Ferguson missed to bring any silverware at OT in his first 4-5 years.
City needs stability and the only way to reach that is to not change managers all the time.
andrewmswift
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 6,957
MSP said:It would be big blow for both club and much more to Mancini's reputation but club doesn't become successful with changing managers each 2 years.
United would still be on Everton's levels if they did it when Ferguson missed to bring any silverware at OT in his first 4-5 years.
City needs stability and the only way to reach that is to not change managers all the time.
I don't get how people can't see that. Unless we totally fall apart (10+ points off the title, and even then it'd be a risky idea) changing the manager would be a disaster.
but no omg mourinho is the greatest ever blah blah blah
MSP
Well-Known Member
I would maybe take Mourinho though if I could see him staying for longer time. He's the best out there. It would be difficult though as he would require more money to build his own team.
But don't want him come here and to get bored in 2 years. So, Mancini is the single option unless he, as you said, screw it hard.
But don't want him come here and to get bored in 2 years. So, Mancini is the single option unless he, as you said, screw it hard.
andrewmswift
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 6,957
MSP said:I would maybe take Mourinho though if I could see him staying for longer time. He's the best out there. It would be difficult though as he would require more money to build his own team.
But don't want him come here and to get bored in 2 years. So, Mancini is the single option unless he, as you said, screw it hard.
the problem is that Mourinho is an absolute dick. it's not like i'd support city any less but everytime he'd pull his antics i'd cringe
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
you actually can judge a thread on the OP.
someone like TTTCitybhoy is a decent lad therefore I respect his opinion.
you're a proven gooner and talk out of your arse all the frigging time.
therefore, whilst I admit Roberto may be under some pressure if we don't win the league, I don't accept your opinion at all.
someone like TTTCitybhoy is a decent lad therefore I respect his opinion.
you're a proven gooner and talk out of your arse all the frigging time.
therefore, whilst I admit Roberto may be under some pressure if we don't win the league, I don't accept your opinion at all.
burnley blue mcfc
Well-Known Member
We've a proven track record that sackin managers every 2yrs DOSEN'T WORK!!, stability is the key 2 our trophy winning future, in roberto we trust ctid
MSP
Well-Known Member
andrewmswift said:MSP said:I would maybe take Mourinho though if I could see him staying for longer time. He's the best out there. It would be difficult though as he would require more money to build his own team.
But don't want him come here and to get bored in 2 years. So, Mancini is the single option unless he, as you said, screw it hard.
the problem is that Mourinho is an absolute dick. it's not like i'd support city any less but everytime he'd pull his antics i'd cringe
I don't care if he is dick or not as well as you support Barcelona or not :)
He is the best in his job (or at least he would be when Ferguson retires) and has balls to stand in front all those twats that are doing everything to see us down. There's nothing like feeling a pressure while doing his job with Mourinho and if I would know he could stay with us for longer period I'd be for him no matter what as he is the best character for team so hated like we are. RM are in pretty similar situation like we are and he is showing a finger to everyone very successfully and consistently.
But can't see him staying for long anywhere and don't want us to turn to another Chelsea where managers are been replaced each season + we're not in situation (FFPR) to provide him a money to build his team so I'd stick with Mancini even if I have some reserves about him.