I hate to say it

Damocles said:
Calcio said:
LoveCity said:
Of course he prepared, he said that to take heat off his players. We've not had a match for nearly a week, the players have been training and that includes tactical training for the next game.
well he took the heat of the players and put the heat on himself. mancini is not in a position to take the heat of the players when there's question marks about him more than the players. It was just a weird thing to say I thought Everton away was gonna be easier. i think we have something like 1 win in 14 over there. If City dont win the league, its all mancinis fault. He has the best team and spend far more money than anyone else

There's only question marks around him from idiots. His record speaks for itself.

Only idiots hey?

Good to know ...
 
Calcio said:
Damocles said:
superstevieg said:
although there are question marks regarding his man management skills, i think he's the man for the job. lets face it, we have been incredibly unlucky with refereeing decisions in the last 6 games. if the officials had done their jobs properly we wouldn't be having this discussion.

He's successfully managed some of the most volatile players in the world including Balotelli, Ibrahimovic, Figo, Nuno Gomes, Crespo, Stam and Lopez.

His man management is only called into question by people who had no idea who he was before he came here.
Im sorry, but when you say you didnt prepare for an everton away game and you thought it was gonna be easier, people will ask questions. Everton is one of the hardest away games and our record there is shocking. How can he underestimate them of all teams?
Are you still here? Shouldn't you be off somewhere crying about Wilshere's broken leg?
 
BillyShears said:
Damocles said:
Calcio said:
well he took the heat of the players and put the heat on himself. mancini is not in a position to take the heat of the players when there's question marks about him more than the players. It was just a weird thing to say I thought Everton away was gonna be easier. i think we have something like 1 win in 14 over there. If City dont win the league, its all mancinis fault. He has the best team and spend far more money than anyone else

There's only question marks around him from idiots. His record speaks for itself.

Only idiots hey?

Good to know ...

Yes. As I say, his record speaks for itself.
 
I swear this forum is full of idiots. One fool said im Arsenal fan and every fool is just repeating it now. getting tiresome how anyone who says anything negative get called names in this forum. Keep deluding yourself that everything is fine at City and mancini is doing a great job. Like people using going out of the CL was because of inexperience. only napoli to be even more inexperience
 
Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Damocles said:
There's only question marks around him from idiots. His record speaks for itself.

Only idiots hey?

Good to know ...

Yes. As I say, his record speaks for itself.

And as I said. Good to know...

Also nice to see you not being overly aggressive and overly judgmental or getting yourself involved in petty sniping. That stuff is best left to those idiots to whom you refer...
 
Calcio said:
I swear this forum is full of idiots. One fool said im Arsenal fan and every fool is just repeating it now. getting tiresome how anyone who says anything negative get called names in this forum. Keep deluding yourself that everything is fine at City and mancini is doing a great job. Like people using going out of the CL was because of inexperience. only napoli to be even more inexperience

<a class="postlink-local" href="http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=238457&p=4956862#p4956862" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=1&t=238457&p=4956862#p4956862</a>

Im honestly shocked how many assists he has. He has done better than I expected. But it seems some people here who hasn’t watched him that much and only seen highlights expected a creative genius, which he is not. At the same time if you actually talk about his flaws, you will get called bitter. Its little bit like when I talk about how awesome Adam Johnson is for City and my mate tells me how he disappears from games and can be inconsistent. But I only watch City when they play big games so I don’t watch their players that much.

Nasri as you said had 3 great months for us rest of the time he was decent. People also forget that Wenger didn’t fully trsut him in the middle and said he preferred Cesc and Ramsey there. Last season he played in the middle when Cesc was out and Ramsey was still recovering. Whats interesting is that when Ramsey got his match fitness, wenger shifted Nasri to the wing. Wenger wanted absolutely to keep him. But he wasn’t gonna give nasri the playmaker position.

For me Nasris problems are simple. He has world class attribute as a footballer, but lack the mental strength and self belief to be among the best. He should be much better than he actually is with his talent…that’s the frustrating part. So when Arsenal fans slag him off, people think its his talent we are talking about….far from it.

Ok, now you're banned for wumming
 
Calcio said:
I swear this forum is full of idiots. One fool said im Arsenal fan and every fool is just repeating it now. getting tiresome how anyone who says anything negative get called names in this forum. Keep deluding yourself that everything is fine at City and mancini is doing a great job. Like people using going out of the CL was because of inexperience. only napoli to be even more inexperience

Well hes doing better than Venger whos been your manager for 120 years....does that hurt..
 
BillyShears said:
Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Only idiots hey?

Good to know ...

Yes. As I say, his record speaks for itself.

And as I said. Good to know...

Also nice to see you not being overly aggressive and overly judgmental or getting yourself involved in petty sniping. That stuff is best left to those idiots to whom you refer...

I'm not being aggressive or judgemental.

I believe that anybody who is questioning the managerial talent of a manager who has 3 league titles and 7 national cups to their name are idiots. This is because the evidence is blindly pointing at them and they are ignoring it. I believe that that fits the textbook definition of what an idiot is<br /><br />-- Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:33 pm --<br /><br />
Didsbury Dave said:
Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Only idiots hey?

Good to know ...

Yes. As I say, his record speaks for itself.

I've questioned some of his decisions since he arrived.

Am I an idiot?

Of course not, there's a major difference between question his decisions and questioning his talent.
 
Damocles said:
I'm not being aggressive or judgemental.

I believe that anybody who is questioning the managerial talent of a manager who has 3 league titles and 7 national cups to their name are idiots. This is because the evidence is blindly pointing at them and they are ignoring it. I believe that that fits the textbook definition of what an idiot is

"I believe" isn't the textbook definition of anything. It's your opinion.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.