Halfpenny said:And United playing their strongest 11 isn't an excuse any more; we're as good as them, if not better man for man. I want Mancini in but he desperately needs to take a different approach in these games because the Italian mindset really doesn't work.zeven said:What the fuck is wrong with you guys? it was UNITED? not a pub team, They know how to defend and did if pretty well tonight! they played their strongest eleven.
ThreeTeamSupporter said:Sorry, a POOR rag side? That's absolute nonsense, and you should know it.
I'm slightly disappointed, but for god's sake, we're talking about a team that are above us in the table, unbeaten this season, and have challenged for the past god knows how many seasons.
Get some f**king perspective. This was always going to be a tough game.
Halfpenny said:The thing that annoys me is that they were there for the taking. The performance was lacklustre, negative and lacked any kind of passion. A bit of forward thinking and we'd have battered them tonight. These tactics work against Chelsea but they never do against United.
Jesus. Why do people seem to think that those of us calling for a more attacking mentality automatically means we want them to go all out? I don't. I just want to see a bit more creativity, a bit more forward thinking rather than passing backwards or sideways.PistonBlue said:Halfpenny said:And United playing their strongest 11 isn't an excuse any more; we're as good as them, if not better man for man. I want Mancini in but he desperately needs to take a different approach in these games because the Italian mindset really doesn't work.
Yeah you're right, we should have played 3-2-5, handed them the midfield and the game. But at least we'd have lost gallantly. ffs
Halfpenny said:Jesus. Why do people seem to think that those of us calling for a more attacking mentality automatically means we want them to go all out? I don't. I just want to see a bit more creativity, a bit more forward thinking rather than passing backwards or sideways.PistonBlue said:Yeah you're right, we should have played 3-2-5, handed them the midfield and the game. But at least we'd have lost gallantly. ffs
mackenzie said:ThreeTeamSupporter said:Sorry, a POOR rag side? That's absolute nonsense, and you should know it.
I'm slightly disappointed, but for god's sake, we're talking about a team that are above us in the table, unbeaten this season, and have challenged for the past god knows how many seasons.
Get some f**king perspective. This was always going to be a tough game.
Of course it is a POOR rag side. Compare it to the sides they have had and compare OUR sides to the one we have now. That is NOT nonsense.
I don't care where they have finished in the table in previous seasons or for how long, my point IS that they were they were there to be taken because poorer teams than us have done it at THEIRS. And it showed tonight. They were poor against us in the last COMS Derby and they were even worse tonight.
And I've got "f***ing perspective" thanks.....and it seems to be a "tough game" in the minds of a few, when in reality it shouldn't be. Not against that team....it's POOR!
WINNING MENTALITY: They don't have a sniff of goal They counter and it leads to fuck all. They don't know where the net is - what we do.Nelly's Left Foot said:I need the phrase " winning mentality" to be explained to me.
I guess it's something we havent got and are still trying to work on.
Prestwich_Blue said:Simple question - would anyone be happy with that on Saturday against Brum?