Let's put this 'grown man attacks a child' bullshit to bed right here, shall we.
One was 22, the other 17. Not a huge age gap. In other circumstances, they could quite easily be part of the same peer group on a night out in town.
And, according to the Guardian, the 17-year-old gobshite is actually bigger than Hazard. Both taller and heavier. So that doesn't fit the 'child abuse' conspiracies either.
If you were a father, which one would you be prouder to have as a son? I know my answer, and it isn't a cheating, play-acting, obnoxious Welsh fairy who is still a ballboy at 17.