If City and the rags were to merge...

[bluecityboy]

I was reading the MUEN article about the proposed merger in the 60s and it got me thinking. If City and the rags were to merge against our wishes, would you continue supporting the club? Forgive my ignorance but is there modern example of anything similar ever happening?

 

[davymcfc]

Would be very difficult. I hate the rags and everything they stand for.

 

[smeeagain]

i think everybody has gone to the bog to be sick

 

[Goater's Nipple]

If the team name was 'Manchester City', our shirts were blue and played at the Etihad stadium, then I think I'd be all for it.

Oh, as long as we got them to throw in Phil Jones. We would be complete then.

 

[bluecityboy]

i think everybody has gone to the bog to be sick

Imagine how I felt to actually write and contemplate it.

 

[rodders1973]

Never not in my lifetime.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire S A510e using Tapatalk

 

[super_city_si]

If it means seeing Cleverly in a blue shirt, im all for it.

 

[Kippax.]

Would "We" now really known any difference?

If it did happen in the 60's then we wouldnt of cared less. We would of probably been called Manchester, doesnt sound right but I would probably of supported them.

 

[Champions2012!]

You mentioning City and rags in one sentence is making me physically ill

 

[MCFC BOB]

Yes.

Hart
Richards - Kompany - Vidic - Clichy
Valencia - Yaya - Carrick - Silva
Rooney - Aguero

De Gea; Smalling, Lescott, Barry, Nasri, Tevez, Van Persie.