Banning the Scum will only play into their hands. Think about it. Headlines for them ‘We have been banned but we will stay say the truth’ ad infinitum. Just giving them more headlines. Best way to hit them is a) ignore them and b) stop buying the paper or clicking on their links or stories. They make their money from people reading their articles, nough said?
Good idea. No reason why we couldn't do this.We could also pick and choose those journalists who we think are fair, they don’t have to be biased to us just fair, and give them some ‘inside’ information occasionally. Let the scum figure out why they aren’t getting it.
We could also pick and choose those journalists who we think are fair, they don’t have to be biased to us just fair, and give them some ‘inside’ information occasionally. Let the scum figure out why they aren’t getting it.
You mean like we do already?
Disney buying Ruperts share in SKY, so Manchester City's ‘Disneyfication’ of football is just a quack awayOur owner and Rupert are closer than you think... For the record, the Sun also went after Scott Sinclair's missus Helen Flanaghan when she stupidly posed with a gun - as others have stated - nothing more than it being commercially viable to their readership.
https://www.thenational.ae/business/sheikh-mansour-bin-zayed-invests-in-arabic-sky-news-1.500977
*sniff*Fergie refused to deal with the BBC for over a decade.
Didn't stop the BBC still fawning over United and making them first in the running order.