If Liverpool or United achieved the same results, there would be no debate

[flobo]

Miguel Delaney in the Independent at least told the truth. The tv companies are very wary of City and our potential to basically destroy all competition over the next several years. We don’t have the fan base of United, pool, Arsenal or Spurs and judging by the back pages above, we don’t sell papers either.
We’re bad for business basically, expect a full frontal assault on ‘City’s obscene spending’ over the summer.

Isn't the PL more popular worldwide than ever before...City can't be that bad for business

 

[kaz7]

Miguel Delaney in the Independent at least told the truth. The tv companies are very wary of City and our potential to basically destroy all competition over the next several years. We don’t have the fan base of United, pool, Arsenal or Spurs and judging by the back pages above, we don’t sell papers either.
We’re bad for business basically, expect a full frontal assault on ‘City’s obscene spending’ over the summer.

If 100 points doesn't get them onside nothing will,we are more wary of them than they could ever be of us

 

[Chris in London]

Miguel Delaney in the Independent at least told the truth. The tv companies are very wary of City and our potential to basically destroy all competition over the next several years. We don’t have the fan base of United, pool, Arsenal or Spurs and judging by the back pages above, we don’t sell papers either.
We’re bad for business basically, expect a full frontal assault on ‘City’s obscene spending’ over the summer.

Do you have a link for the Delaney article?

 

[Sir peace frog]

sad facts are we are up against a club that claims to be the biggest and best supported club in the world ,now if you were a united fan would you look through the papers if it was a city wank fest ,they have a huge audience with united and Liverpool fans world wide ,why would they piss on their chips ,business is business ,its not particularly fair ,but what in life is nowadays

people on here should click on city stories and links ,the more clicks the more and better coverage.

 

[Groke]

Isn't the PL more popular worldwide than ever before...City can't be that bad for business

Yep, city are one of the most watched teams as well. And no, spurs haven't got a bigger fan base.

 

[Txiki Txiki Bang Bang]

Not even relevant. We all know this achievement by anyone other than City would have been lauded. KDB would have been PotY, Pep MotY. Anyone other than City is the mantra nowadays.

Wish our club would actually make mention of the fact that we have an uphill battle against the media/press. Maybe Pep not getting MotY would ignite the conversation

No need mentioning it, you would just make the media houses feel powerful, if this continues next season, then a media boycott would be the best response, keep the British media out in the cold and give exclusive interviews to ESPN and Amazon sports.

 

[kaz7]

Look at the papers the day we got 100 points ffs.

Only two newspapers put us as the lead story, and one of those it was a combined story with Salah's record.

My favourite one is the Guardian, which says "City join the hundred club." Which hundred club would that be, and who else is in this club?

But there is no agenda

 

[blue_paul]

Yep, city are one of the most watched teams as well. And no, spurs haven't got a bigger fan base.

They do in the UK, they’ve had huge crowds for a lot of fixtures this season.

 

[blue_paul]

Do you have a link for the Delaney article?

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...s-mohamed-salah-goals-liverpool-a8350606.html

 

[Chris in London]

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...s-mohamed-salah-goals-liverpool-a8350606.html

Cheers