Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,234
That's exactly how I see it too. I don't buy into these claims of corruption or an anti-City conspiracy, but there is undoubtedly an inherent bias towards them twats that has been built up over the years.LongsightM13 said:Decisions like last night's are the result of decades of concerted intimidation and criticism of referees by that wonderful knight of the realm, and the fact he has been allowed to get away with it time after time by a spineless FA.
Of course, referees should be man enough to stand up to the bullying old pisscan, but they are only human and this sort of stuff will creep into the sub-conscious when split second decisions need to be made.
After all, who would you rather upset? The powerful man who will rant and rave in your face and call you a cheat and an idiot on TV, or the quietly spoken fella who manages a middle of the road club like Fulham?
It is all quite deliberate, a policy honed over the decades to give himself even the slightest edge.
It is a form of cheating, in its own way as odious as Italy's Calciopoli scandal, but will never be widely accepted as such by a media whose individuals are fearful of being on the end of similar treatment themselves, banned from the club and the biggest games if they dare to wander from the party line.
While Shakin Bacon has been brilliant for the rags, he has been terrible for football.