I'm thinking it is corrupt

[moomba]

moomba

Picture the scene - you're talking to a United fan in a pub and you tell him what you've said on here, about decisions.

He says 'don't be silly, we have loads go against us' or something similar.

You think it's acceptable to call him a ****?

Of course, you won't now admit that you're wrong because you're on a forum, and very few people ever do. But the above shows that you have badly overreacted on here.

Let me know if you want to return to the actual debate, rather than continue this petty exchange.

If someone in a pub that I'd just met told me that my views were silly, that I was immature and deluded then yes, I absolutely think it justifies telling him or her that he or she is a **** and to fuck off.

If a visitor to my house came in and did the same they might even find a few more choice words thrown in for good measure. You are currently in my house, and rapidly outstaying your welcome unless your condascending, insulting attitude changes.

 

[meldrew]

At the end of the day its not just moomba's point of view, ask any other fan and they will agree united fans are ****'s!

 

[Lucky Toma]

moomba

Picture the scene - you're talking to a United fan in a pub and you tell him what you've said on here, about decisions.

He says 'don't be silly, we have loads go against us' or something similar.

You think it's acceptable to call him a ****?

Of course, you won't now admit that you're wrong because you're on a forum, and very few people ever do. But the above shows that you have badly overreacted on here.

Let me know if you want to return to the actual debate, rather than continue this petty exchange.

If someone in a pub that I'd just met told me that my views were silly, that I was immature and deluded then yes, I absolutely think it justifies telling him or her that he or she is a **** and to fuck off.

I think this is where the rag tells you again that he is obviously more mature than you and tuts sadly Moomba :)

 

[Matty]

If you cannot see that you lot get many, many more decisions for than against then you are not worth debating with.

Got any proof for that?

You call me condescending for not replying an insult with another insult?

Of course it's my fault... yes, that makes perfect sense.

So, because we don't actually have the statistical evidence to support the viewpoint it therefore makes it incorrect? Not so. Perhaps we don't have the statistical evidence to support it because it's virtually impossible to find? Or because it's not the kind of thing that, year on year, is accurately, and impartially, recorded (please don't quote that ridiculous, and uncoroborated, website again as "proof").

For over 20 years teams have watched United time and again get decision after decision going their way, whilst other sides don't get the same benefits shown to them. We can all quote examples, the 4-3 derby defeat for example, Owen's winner in the 8th minute of injury time afetr 5 minutes was indicated. The excuse, added time to the injury time based on goals scored, a pitch invader and substitutions. Fast forward a few months to Everton v United, 3 minutes injury time indicated, substitutions and a goal in those 3 minutes, ZERO seconds added on, even though Everton were breaking dangerously at the +3 minute mark. That's just one or many examples that spring to mind.

When something is so prevelant, so obvious and so clear to see with the naked eye why on earth would anyone bother to record statistical evidence to support it? It's bright and sunny in Manchester today, just because I can't quote the temperature to you doesn't mean it's actually overcast and rainy.

 

[mcfcgaz]

ffs some on here really need to get a grip. Just had a mate of mine link me up to rag issue and they are fucking pissing themselves at some of yous. YES it was a penalty, and I am still fucking raging but to say the league is corrupt is embarrassing.

Also had a look at this which makes for interesting read.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.debatabledecisions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.debatabledecisions.com/</a>

Onwards and upwards blues!

 

[cyprustavern]

the place is wall to wall full of undercover rag CUNTS

 

[Neville Kneville]

moomba

Picture the scene - you're talking to a United fan in a pub and you tell him what you've said on here, about decisions.

He says 'don't be silly, we have loads go against us' or something similar.

You think it's acceptable to call him a ****?

Of course, you won't now admit that you're wrong because you're on a forum, and very few people ever do. But the above shows that you have badly overreacted on here.

Let me know if you want to return to the actual debate, rather than continue this petty exchange.

-- Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:09 am --

Lucky toma

You make it sound like I've entered a room.

I'm doing other things, but I thought I could log on and debate last night's decision, in the context of whether it shows some sort of conspiracy.

I don't think there's anything wrong with that, so maybe we should agree to disagree. One things for sure, calling people cunts and twats is unnecessary.

Why do you feel the need to come onto a City forum to debate Utd being a bunch of overrated, nervous, stuffy bastards ?

What are you hoping to achieve ? The sudden realisation that we don't like you very much ?

Or perhaps the fact that some people somewhere, any people anywhere, aren't swallowing the utter bullshit pumped out by your club week in week out to your friends in the media, is too much for you to take, & you have to work on them in case they somehow join the accepted thought pattern ?

 

[warren_richards04]

moomba

Okay - we'll agree to disagree, but I'd wager that most normal people think that calling someone a **** is on a different level to calling their view silly.

As I said, feel free to return to the debate when you like.

Debating an insult is rather petty of us both, isn't it?

 

[Matty]

ffs some on here really need to get a grip. Just had a mate of mine link me up to rag issue and they are fucking pissing themselves at some of yous. YES it was a penalty, and I am still fucking raging but to say the league is corrupt is embarrassing.

Also had a look at this which makes for interesting read.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.debatabledecisions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.debatabledecisions.com/</a>

Onwards and upwards blues!

Thats been linked to previously, and is essentially worthless. It's one person's (or a small group of people's) opinions on what they deem to be "debateable". I can guarantee you that any one of us could go through their entire list of "debateable decisions" for this season and list another 5 or 6 that they haven't covered. Just because they've turned it into a fancy website with a league table doesn't make it any more valid than mine or your opinion.

 

[meldrew]

ffs some on here really need to get a grip. Just had a mate of mine link me up to rag issue and they are fucking pissing themselves at some of yous. YES it was a penalty, and I am still fucking raging but to say the league is corrupt is embarrassing.

Also had a look at this which makes for interesting read.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.debatabledecisions.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.debatabledecisions.com/</a>

Onwards and upwards blues!

Who cares what they think, they get the rub of the green and that **** has got the refs in his back pocket and will do till the fucker dies or retires.

We haven't helped ourselves with some of the results, its the fact these fuckers are being dragged over the line to win this!