Incel Rebellion

We are living in an age of sexual capitalism. We need a Thomas Piketty of carnal knowledge to analyse the intricacies and logic of sexual inequality. But the broad outlines were already laid down in the theory of historical materialism. Because the underlying reality of sex is that it is not an experience but a commodity. We do not speak (alas) of “doing” sex (much less “feeling”), we speak of “having” it. Even French speaks of “possessing” and “possession”.

And as soon as it is possible to have it, it is also possible to not have it. And the divide between the “haves” and the “have-nots” is historically determined to get greater. More and more sex will be concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people, leaving a potential army of the sexually destitute. A whole proletariat of lonely losers, hunting for crumbs from the table.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-minassian-canada-terrorism-a8335816.html?amp
 
Let's be honest, almost all of this comes from the view that men are somehow owed sex from women. Perhaps the most revealing thing about these people is that they think the reason they're not having sex is because of their ugly face rather than their hideous personality. If these blokes were in India, they'd probably be throwing acid in the face of someone for refusing their marriage proposal. Some men just think they're owed the affections of a woman. And it's almost as if they don't see the irony when they aren't willing to go out with the 'unattractive' woman.

On a lighter note, here's Nick Helm satirizing it perfectly.



Also quite funny:

 
Last edited:
You always find them on the misc section of the BodyBuilding.com forum.
 
We are living in an age of sexual capitalism. We need a Thomas Piketty of carnal knowledge to analyse the intricacies and logic of sexual inequality. But the broad outlines were already laid down in the theory of historical materialism. Because the underlying reality of sex is that it is not an experience but a commodity. We do not speak (alas) of “doing” sex (much less “feeling”), we speak of “having” it. Even French speaks of “possessing” and “possession”.

And as soon as it is possible to have it, it is also possible to not have it. And the divide between the “haves” and the “have-nots” is historically determined to get greater. More and more sex will be concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people, leaving a potential army of the sexually destitute. A whole proletariat of lonely losers, hunting for crumbs from the table.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-minassian-canada-terrorism-a8335816.html?amp
Blimey!
 
We are living in an age of sexual capitalism. We need a Thomas Piketty of carnal knowledge to analyse the intricacies and logic of sexual inequality. But the broad outlines were already laid down in the theory of historical materialism. Because the underlying reality of sex is that it is not an experience but a commodity. We do not speak (alas) of “doing” sex (much less “feeling”), we speak of “having” it. Even French speaks of “possessing” and “possession”.

And as soon as it is possible to have it, it is also possible to not have it. And the divide between the “haves” and the “have-nots” is historically determined to get greater. More and more sex will be concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people, leaving a potential army of the sexually destitute. A whole proletariat of lonely losers, hunting for crumbs from the table.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-minassian-canada-terrorism-a8335816.html?amp

I did tell the independent not to publish the details of my private life.
 
If anyone has the spare time and doesn't mind repetition, I would encourage skim reading parts of Elliot Rodger's "manifesto". An alarming descent into madness and was so nearly thwarted by the authorities.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.