PistonBlue said:
Yes, you have been, thanks.
As I've said I haven't read the report and don't intend to. I have in laws who are Liverpool fans who were at the game. My brother in law lost a good mate at Hillsborough, and stopped going to Anfield for almost ten years after that day. My father in law hasn't been since. We've spoken about it, and they are both still disgusted at the behaviour of some Liverpool supporters prior to the sad events that unfolded.
I appreciate the police were wrong on many levels, but I cannot and do not accept that every LFC fan at the ground that day was the picture of sweetness and light. I think that is a naive idea. Surely those that arrived with no ticket, intent on getting into the ground were at least in some part responsible for what happened.
All clubs have their rogue element. All cities too. I do not think that all Liverpool fans are sweetness and light, no more than I think City fans or any others are. The key thing is that there were not too many people in Leppings lane and so there was no effect if there were people without tickets. Furthermore, if Man City got to the European Cup Final; for example, and you didn't get a ticket, would you travel anyway to see your beloved team? The ticket allocation was a contributing factor. Liverpool had an average crowd of 45k, Forest of 22k (actual figures may not be correct here, but certainly similar proportions). There were complains from Liverpool FC about this the previous season too. Now the Liverpool ticket ofice has much to be desired, and tickets often do not go to those that deserve them, so ifany blame can be put on LFC, then there it is. For that game itself, I had been to every match home and away for the previous 2 seasons, along with a couple of mates. Not all of us were entitled to tickets. We actually got them from another source (within Nottingham Forest but for the Liverpool End) to fill the needs of our ‘regular’ contingent. Our ticket office is still shite.
But that was also a small factor. The Cullen report into the Piper Alpha disaster said something along the lines of just because someone is in the position of OIM (Offshore Installation Manager), does not mean he is fit for the job in event of emergency' Now I am not on a witch hunt against Duckensfield or Murray, they have to try to get to sleep every night thinking about the results of their actions – and it was not deliberate – in fact Duckensfield was not experienced enough for the job, so perhaps his superiors should be called to question on that (who said we are all promoted to the point of incompetance?). I know Anne Williams feels sorry for him for that reason. Any disaster is a chain of events, and break one link and the disaster would not have happened. The delays because of roadworks on the M62 would probably have avoided it for examle. It was all just a horrible mess.
The causes of the disaster are no longer the key issue though, it is the cover-up by both conservatice and labour governemnts. The Taylor report was fine and factual, but it is only the Interim report that deals with what happened – The Final Report deals with recommendations and none of the causes. Which one would you read if you wanted to see what the Taylor Report concluded? The Smith scrutiny was a joke from the start with his intentions (instructions?) clear from the off.. The , ahem, ‘Apology’ from the Sun newspaper only went on to say that Liverpool people were out of order for having a go at Rooney for writing for that paper (Before he went to United, most people had sympathy for his as they reaslised it was his agent, and lets face it, he was only a baby at the time).