Iran

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
British Falklands invaded on the orders of a failing/failed Tinpot fascist General who didn't care too much for his own people..... Just as well we had some ships available as 6 months later (maybe sooner) it wouldn't have been possible
 
Another nation put land troops on our territory. It doesn’t matter if it’s Skegness or Gibraltar.

Where do you draw the line at other countries invading us?

That did happen, it was over 99% in favour of remaining a British colony. They had their own referendum.

So what would have happened if China had put boots on Hong Kong before we handed over to them?

Do you think as mad as she was dear old Mrs T would have gone to war with China not a hope in hell.

The Falklands had referendum in 2013 the war was in 1982 !!!

I don't agree with colonialism at all and we acquired a lot of these places its very dark places in history for me in particularly the slavery.
 
So what would have happened if China had put boots on Hong Kong before we handed over to them?

Do you think as mad as she was dear old Mrs T would have gone to war with China not a hope in hell.

The Falklands had referendum in 2013 the war was in 1982 !!!

I don't agree with colonialism at all and we acquired a lot of these places its very dark places in history for me in particularly the slavery.

Do you agree with handing NI to Ireland, Gibraltar to Spain, Scotland to Scotland, Wales to Wales? What about Catalonia and Spain?

The only thing that matters is what the people of those countries/territories want.

Until then, the UK has a sovereign right and duty to protect its territory however it needs to and wherever it lies.

Rather bizarrely those with this point of view also believe that the UK should join in and integrate to become part of any future EU super-state...
 
So what would have happened if China had put boots on Hong Kong before we handed over to them?

Do you think as mad as she was dear old Mrs T would have gone to war with China not a hope in hell.

The Falklands had referendum in 2013 the war was in 1982 !!!

I don't agree with colonialism at all and we acquired a lot of these places its very dark places in history for me in particularly the slavery.

It’s a completely and utterly different arrangement. We loaned Hong Kong from China, it wasn’t ever our indefinite territory.

And even if it was, she probably wouldn’t unless she was confident we could win but she was with the Falklands, obviously.

Yes and prior to 1983 and during it the islanders were and are British, they were waving British flags.

I don’t like it either but when we have these colonies still and the PEOPLE that live there want to remain as British, then we must protect them and their towns.

How would you like it if you were British and foreign soldiers invaded and you weren’t helped or liberated?
 
So what would have happened if China had put boots on Hong Kong before we handed over to them?

Do you think as mad as she was dear old Mrs T would have gone to war with China not a hope in hell.

The Falklands had referendum in 2013 the war was in 1982 !!!

I don't agree with colonialism at all and we acquired a lot of these places its very dark places in history for me in particularly the slavery.

A WUM. Spotted a mile away or someone who doesn’t have a clue. If I come to his house and plant my tent there will it be OK? No I thought not as it is his territory.
 
You don't think Saudi Arabia counts as a country then?

No, it's a totalitarian absolute monarchy that exists only to serve the resource needs of US/UK, in particular, but global fossil fuel dependence.


May I also point out that rejecting the EU isn't rejecting Europe (of which you do not appear to notice we are a part.)

I know the UK is physically part of Europe but I would counter that the majority does not feel part of Europe as evidenced by the Brexit nonsense. A great example yesterday at Europa park in Germany, English woman complaining that she didn't have any 1 Euro coins for the dryers after a water ride - I thought, you're at an amusement park that is named after Europe and in Germany where the currency is Euros yet shocked at the need for local currency. That, in a nutshell, is how the English appear to view Europe - good luck partnering with the Americans on matters other than warring.


It is also a matter of fact not opinion that NATO - and not the EU - has kept the continent secure for the last 80 years.

Seeing that WWII ended 74 years ago, and NATO was formed 70 years ago I think you're kidding yourself. Moreover, the one time post WWII that NATO actually needed to secure the continent in the 90s with the Balkans, they didn't do a damn thing while millions were slaughtered. NATO was a cold war creation that permitted US to manufacture an 'alliance' when all it wanted was to spread it's global military influence.


Nevertheless, when it comes to the spoils of international conflict I think you'll find our noble European friends at the head of the queue fighting for a share of the pickings.

Which NATO conflicts are so many noble European friends profiting from I wonder? Take your time - Libya? Bosnia? Kosovo?
 
Last edited:
Do you agree with handing NI to Ireland, Gibraltar to Spain, Scotland to Scotland, Wales to Wales? What about Catalonia and Spain?

The only thing that matters is what the people of those countries/territories want.

Until then, the UK has a sovereign right and duty to protect its territory however it needs to and wherever it lies.

Rather bizarrely those with this point of view also believe that the UK should join in and integrate to become part of any future EU super-state...
I don't know that Scotland or Wales willingly joined the Union. Perhaps depending on your point of view. However they have been part of it and it's political structures for long enough.
I don't know your history with Spain and Gibraltar. I don't know what the will of the citizens there is but i would imagine they are comfortable being British. Does that ignore the will of the Spanish people on the other side of the border? I don't know enough, as I've said. So I'll stay out of that one.
NI was never a country however, until it became a British Conservative solution to both renege on the will of the island of Ireland which had voted for home rule and had it passed in Westminster and to appease the Ulster Unionists who threatened rivers of blood. There would have been an unmerciful civil war, with one side being heavily backed by Westminster.
As it turned out there was a civil war in the 26 counties as a fallout to accepting the British resolution.
The troubles in the North, didn't just happen in the 60s.
It was a direct result of British NI policy and letting social injustice happen as a policy.

Anyway. Overall I agree with your point of allowing the people themselves to decide their own fate. But in doing so just remember who created these arbitrary borders in the first place. Therefore, a great deal of thought goes into who the people that get a say, are.

Personally I wouldn't trust a Tory government to do anything right by the people of Ireland North or South.
They have a long history of nothing more than self interest. I think Conservative and Unionist party is a banner of convenience at times. Let's face it they'd hang NI out at the drop of a hat and I'd wager a large portion of England would too without batting an eyelid.

I've said all along you have a right to leave the EU. You voted to leave so you should.
But you should never have done so before first considering the implications for the citizens of The North.
If there were implications for your Union members that were not the same for all states/countries then that issue should have been sorted first.
If that meant complex difficult decisions regarding your own union. Tough.
For whether we like it or not here in the South. We are heavily involved through the GFA that we signed up for.

Regarding the joining of the EU super state. You have a choice whether you want to or not. It is not the same as the choice given us when we were part of the UK and it is not the same as the choice given to your empire colonies. when you had an empire.
 
I don't know that Scotland or Wales willingly joined the Union. Perhaps depending on your point of view. However they have been part of it and it's political structures for long enough.
I don't know your history with Spain and Gibraltar. I don't know what the will of the citizens there is but i would imagine they are comfortable being British. Does that ignore the will of the Spanish people on the other side of the border? I don't know enough, as I've said. So I'll stay out of that one.
NI was never a country however, until it became a British Conservative solution to both renege on the will of the island of Ireland which had voted for home rule and had it passed in Westminster and to appease the Ulster Unionists who threatened rivers of blood. There would have been an unmerciful civil war, with one side being heavily backed by Westminster.
As it turned out there was a civil war in the 26 counties as a fallout to accepting the British resolution.
The troubles in the North, didn't just happen in the 60s.
It was a direct result of British NI policy and letting social injustice happen as a policy.

Anyway. Overall I agree with your point of allowing the people themselves to decide their own fate. But in doing so just remember who created these arbitrary borders in the first place. Therefore, a great deal of thought goes into who the people that get a say, are.

Personally I wouldn't trust a Tory government to do anything right by the people of Ireland North or South.
They have a long history of nothing more than self interest. I think Conservative and Unionist party is a banner of convenience at times. Let's face it they'd hang NI out at the drop of a hat and I'd wager a large portion of England would too without batting an eyelid.

I've said all along you have a right to leave the EU. You voted to leave so you should.
But you should never have done so before first considering the implications for the citizens of The North.
If there were implications for your Union members that were not the same for all states/countries then that issue should have been sorted first.
If that meant complex difficult decisions regarding your own union. Tough.
For whether we like it or not here in the South. We are heavily involved through the GFA that we signed up for.

Regarding the joining of the EU super state. You have a choice whether you want to or not. It is not the same as the choice given us when we were part of the UK and it is not the same as the choice given to your empire colonies. when you had an empire.

Simple test for me and a democratic one, are the people content being British yes or no?

If it’s yes then carry on, if no then let them determine what they wish to be.
 
You a fan of Luxurious Luxembourg and their noble EU chums then? Or maybe think Jezza's pals in Iran are the real victims of terrorism, or just believe NATO is a pointless waste of money, or the USA is the enemy of everything you hold dear. Probably a case of all the above eh?
Desperate indeed.

No, it is a Capitalist state. Don't be ridiculous.
 
So what would have happened if China had put boots on Hong Kong before we handed over to them?

Do you think as mad as she was dear old Mrs T would have gone to war with China not a hope in hell.

The Falklands had referendum in 2013 the war was in 1982 !!!

I don't agree with colonialism at all and we acquired a lot of these places its very dark places in history for me in particularly the slavery.
Colonialism! Ha. There was no fucker on the Falkland Islands before the Europeans landed there and that was a good time before Argentina existed.

But why am I not surprised that you would have just taken defeat of sovereign land on the chin?
 
Personally I wouldn't trust a Tory government to do anything right by the people of Ireland North or South.
They have a long history of nothing more than self interest. I think Conservative and Unionist party is a banner of convenience at times. Let's face it they'd hang NI out at the drop of a hat and I'd wager a large portion of England would too without batting an eyelid.

This, sadly, is very true
 
The idea that Saudi Arabia would need defending from Iran is laughable. They have the third highest defence spending in the world, ahead of us. I hope not a single penny of our tax money is spent defending that shithole. Obviously warmongering Republicans in America are another story.
 
Simple test for me and a democratic one, are the people content being British yes or no?

If it’s yes then carry on, if no then let them determine what they wish to be.
Simple. Yes, sounds a lot like the GFA to me. However, getting to that agreement was far from simple.
A lot came along reluctantly, and some didn't come along at all, although they benefited from it later.
It sounds a very simple idea, but it takes constant support from all sides, particularly those in power.
Bear in mind my point about these borders being arbitrarily drawn in the first place.
You have to consider the indigenous populations at the time having separation forced upon them.

Peace and prosperity is a very difficult thing to give up and sense can prevail in these conditions.
That's why wise leadership is required.
That wisdom implies the good of the people at heart, whereas I don't believe that was ever the case in any colonial conquest.

I firmly believe that in the case of The North, a consistent gross negligence has been enacted upon them, by those that are supposedly their staunchest advocates or allies.
 
Last edited:
As for Iran, I wouldn't trust anything the Saudi's said for a moment.

.

I prefer reading what my old Chess adversary Dr Micheal Axeworthy, who up until his death was head of Persian studies at Exeter uni, wrote on Iran, he loved the place and he used to tell me about the country whilst we played.

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/middle-east/2018/02/how-iran-s-rise-remaking-middle-east

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/...ran-nuclear-deal-outbreak-organised-stupidity

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/...isis-how-religious-rifts-are-fueling-conflict

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/middle-east/2017/08/sunni-vs-shia-roots-islam-s-civil-war
 
Do you agree with handing NI to Ireland, Gibraltar to Spain, Scotland to Scotland, Wales to Wales? What about Catalonia and Spain?

The only thing that matters is what the people of those countries/territories want.

Until then, the UK has a sovereign right and duty to protect its territory however it needs to and wherever it lies.

Rather bizarrely those with this point of view also believe that the UK should join in and integrate to become part of any future EU super-state...

Bizarrely enough I don't sit in my ivory tower with my monocle twisting my handlebar moustache whilst reminiscing over the good ol' days when we invaded country raped and pillaged countries before colonising them. I have no issues what so ever with handing countries back if that's what the people of these countries wishes are. Scotland has had its referendum and decided against it. No doubt if we No Deal Ireland will be given back and the Welsh, Scotch will want a referendum and good luck to them if this country is allowed to be fucked over socially and economically by psychotic money me I don't blame them little ignorant stupid Englanders can have their country back I would leave this shit hole.
 
Colonialism! Ha. There was no fucker on the Falkland Islands before the Europeans landed there and that was a good time before Argentina existed.

But why am I not surprised that you would have just taken defeat of sovereign land on the chin?

I wouldn't have taken it on the chin but going to war wouldn't have been my first option always the last.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top