I don't need to know what your religion is. In fact, if you read my comment I never said what your religion was at all.
As for the rest, I probably would have picked you up for declaring any religion is "false" because it's such a fucking stupid thing to say, and if you want to know what's prejudiced about declaring an entire religion is backwards and under-developed then you might want to pick up a dictionary.
No, you presumed I had one and have said that my religion, again you do not know if I have one, isn’t better than theirs.
Again, why is saying a particular religion is “false”prejudice?
Let’s see if you can stretch your brain to answering a basic question- Do you think the Prophet Muhammad’s claims are true, realistic or believable?
If the answer is “no”, then you too believe Islam is false.
I never said it was “backwards” nor “under-developed”, I said it’s younger than Christianity and is going through a similar process as Christianity did previously. I mean you could argue it is “backwards” and “undeveloped” in areas, as you could in areas in all religions but you don’t strike me as someone who cares about detail.
When you look at what has been done in the name of Christianity, in the West, in the 20th century and the many centuries before it, and then you look at Islam, it’s easy to see that a large problem currently is Islam’s relative infancy when compared to Christianity.
Several posters across the political spectrum have agreed with this, even the poster I had a disagreement with initially. It’s only you that hasn’t and has chosen to become fabulously offended at a reasonable opinion.