Irish journalist calls City players "c***s"

**Just e-mailed the Irish ombudsman the following. I've heard worse in my time, but that is just way over the top and un-called for, hopefully get a reply within 4 days or maybe 7 and a half depending on Fergie time**


Sir/madam,

I would like to register my disgust at the article written by Dion Fanning in the Independent dated 20/9/09. I agree with everyone having their opinion, however I draw the line at calling anyone c***s.

Being a Manchester City fan, obviously, I am passionate about my club, team and players but when my 8 yr old lad asks me what the missing letters are and the word is, I am convinced that the line has been well and truly crossed.

This is completely unacceptable and needs to be dealt with. This guy obviously has a major chip on his shoulder, to say the least, and I look forward to your e-mail reply by return, stating the action you will be taking against this arrogant, abusive, un-educated, and above all ignorant "journalist"

I look forward to your prompt and favourable reply,

Davemfi
 
I've had Emails back from the Irish Press Ombudsman, saying the article has been removed. Full marks to them for responding so quickly yesterday.
Any more articles in our newspapers I feel disgusted with, I'll being E-mailing our own press complaints. "I'm on a mission"!!!
Wish I got such swift responses from are own FA. There should be a Football Ombudsman to complain to.
 
Does anyone know what the Heading was on the article. Onto the Ombudsman at the moment. I'm Irish and believe me i've been putting up with these Rag and Pool journalism all my life. Basically the rule of thumb over here is Rag fans are in their mid 20s ie have never seen united not winning something and Pool fans are in their late twenties early 30s ie 80s kids when pool were winning. But there are the chosen few who have not gone to the dark side so dont judge us all, my first game was Main Road 1979 last game City v Wolves Aug 09 its been a long road.
 
schumey04 said:
Does anyone know what the Heading was on the article. Onto the Ombudsman at the moment. I'm Irish and believe me i've been putting up with these Rag and Pool journalism all my life. Basically the rule of thumb over here is Rag fans are in their mid 20s ie have never seen united not winning something and Pool fans are in their late twenties early 30s ie 80s kids when pool were winning. But there are the chosen few who have not gone to the dark side so dont judge us all, my first game was Main Road 1979 last game City v Wolves Aug 09 its been a long road.

"Hicks" was one word, of the headline.lol. Does it jog any one else's memory.
 
The twat didn't even bother to reply to my email.

Heres the "article" in question

Hicks emerges with little credit but City still bank on Bellers - Soccer, Sport - Independent.ie


Sunday September 20 2009

The bullish noises coming from Anfield last week that Liverpool is now on course to be the richest, most popular club in the world were tempered a little bit by their timing.

Having worked so hard to seal one of the most lucrative sponsorship deals around, Liverpool's owners would surely have been eager to have announced it a few weeks ago when Rafael Benitez might have been able to find some way to spend some money.

Instead, to the dismay of everyone at the club, Benitez was left with £1.5m to spend at the end of the summer when he had again shown his mastery of the transfer market by selling Xabi Alonso for £30m. Then, amazingly, a few weeks later, Liverpool announce they will be bringing in £80m over the next four years in a deal with Standard Chartered, which, appropriately given the club's financial situation, is a bank.

Of course, it came too late for Benitez to strengthen his squad but there is always January, by which time Liverpool may need to strengthen given their unpromising start to the season. Benitez will, of course, be blamed for this, even by those who should know better like Ronnie Whelan, who claimed on RTE last week that the side facing Debrecen had cost £250m and wondered why the manager had replaced Alonso with Alberto Aquilani who, as far as anyone can tell, has always been injured. The man he should ask is Tom Hicks.

With the transfer window closed, Hicks showed up last week to purr optimistically in his soothing Texan drawl.

If the Liverpool credo used to be that the club "exists to be a source of pride to its supporters -- It has no other purpose," Hicks has modernised that too.

"Our goal is to have less debt than any of the top clubs and that's a commitment we have made and will continue to make," Hicks said last week, an interesting statement considering the club was saddled with their current massive debt when he and George Gillett took over.

But Tom reappeared last week to make some new promises. With some reports questioning if Liverpool's new stadium would be built by 2018, Hicks made the right noises but pointed out that the "global financial markets" were not conducive to building anything right now.

When Tom Hicks took over Liverpool, the global financial markets were in love with guys like Tom Hicks and the new owners promised that the stadium would begin almost immediately, before deciding that they needed some new and impressive plans before anything could happen.

As they were working on those plans, the global financial markets that had been so kind to Tom Hicks imploded, thanks to men like Tom Hicks.

Tom now says he "doesn't know about the dates", a departure from a previous statement when he was able to give the date when the stadium would be built but not when it would be started.

Most of us would have assumed things worked the other way where a start date is set with a rough idea following of when the thing could be finished.

But then again most of us had no idea of the world of Tom Hicks until he came along, swiftly followed by the sub-prime credit crunch and the collapse of everything that was built on the highly leveraged philosophy. We would have assumed that to buy a club like Liverpool, you had to have a lot of money and we would have been wrong about that too. So we should say nothing.

We thought clubs were bought by people like the men who bought Manchester City, but Tom now says their plans to buy every good player they can is "unsustainable". When it comes to things being unsustainable, we should probably listen to Tom Hicks.

City seem sustainable enough at the moment, despite being robbed of every one of their thousands of forwards for today's Manchester derby.

Alex Ferguson's comments that if Emmanuel Adebayor had been one of his players he would have "taken him to a dark room" after last week's display against Arsenal perfectly captures the unusual attraction of this Manchester City team.

There is a sense that Manchester City will be engaging in more acts of provocation over the season. They have assembled a cast that even Sam Peckinpah might have viewed as strangely unsympathetic.

Adebayor was rightly suspended for his stamp on Robin van Persie but has outraged public opinion with his goal celebration which has been viewed as provocation. It seems that few were prepared to view it as the actions of a madman and move on.

Some of the pictures from last Saturday's game showed Arsenal fans laughing as Adebayor ran towards them, but action must be taken because others felt it was incitement to riot. Those who found it provocation to enjoy themselves were ignored.

In fact, the City-Arsenal game was one of those great incendiary occasions which make the Premier League riveting.

Much of this was down to City and their desperadoes. Mark Hughes has defied convention by assembling this collection. They are a team that will always live in interesting times. Today they will be relying on the great Craig Bellamy, who appears to be an outlaw but has also set up a football foundation in Sierra Leone. At lunchtime today, Bellers will be giving something different back.

They will be without Adebayor but they will need more deprivation before City are given sympathy. They have talent and they have men who look like they are bad to the bone.

Nobody, not even Alex Ferguson, ever doubted that you couldn't win anything with kids. Today we will get a better idea if City can win anything with c***s.

dionfanning@gmail.com
 
I thought the article was going to be a lot worse than that. He merely used that word in the end and it shouldn't have been used (not a nice word to use, especially in the public domain). I don't think he was inciting what some people have been suggesting.
 
Coming up blank on the link,just read the artical on here,i hope the bosses at our club read this and do something about it.I would like the so called journalist to come to the West Ham game and be made to stand in front of every stand and say sorry for that sorry piece of shite he wrote,when he has said sorry we can pelt the fucker with rotten fruit.Just can't believe anything like that has gone to print.
 
well actually the word c--t comes from the viking word pouch( i e to put things in) and i would like to put something in his mouth like a knuckle butty or a permenant sleeping tablet?
bananamilksheikh said:
NeverSeenATrophy said:
Must be that or C***s, what other word that fits would need blanking.

it could mean clits!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.