He is. You just don't see it because 9/10 he throws it outkippaxchris said:Marvin said:It's because there are know nothing trolls like you aboutkippaxchris said:It obviously isn't very clear and that's why Harts kicking is always questioned is it not?
If you watch Hart train before the games, you will see him repeatedly kick the ball very accurately out of his hands. It's one of his best skills
You don't see it in City games much because City build up the play through the back four
You could be called a troll then for saying the exact same thing about Panti, it doesn't matter how good he kicks in training he still kicks it off the pitch all the time. And if the way we play can be used as an excuse for Harts distribution then why not for Pantilimons?
I can understand why you would say Panti isn't good at kicking i can understand that you might think Harts distribution is better but what i can't understand is why you think Hart is extremely good at kicking when he clearly isn't!
I don't have any stats to give to you. But I watch a lot of football, and have seen keepers back to the days of macrae and Corrigan. hart is the best kicker of a ball City have ever had. If you ever turn up early at a game, watch Hart's warm-up. if that doesn't convince you how good a kicker is nothing will