Is it just me that thinks the ejections are justified?

[Manchester1894]

Let's face it, you go into the South Stand toilets and the large groups of people drinking tins and smoking weed telling the stewards to fuck off knowing that they intimidate in numbers are gutless little f*ckers... They are no doubt first to cry when banned and plead their innocence.

Equally bad are those BM members who throw out the line 'email Peter Fletcher and grove and you'll get your ticket back". You do NOT get thrown out for standing there doing nothing. No smoke without fire.

 

[bluevengence]

Thank you judge Jeffries

 

[es1]

if you are caught red handed by a steward smoking/drinking cans in the toilets a ban is 100% justified

in the case of swp80 (and anyone else in this position), assuming he can proove his innocence the ban is completely unjust and compensation should be paid

 

[Whisk]

Why not go the whole hog and condemn them to the Tower of London?!

 

[Marpleblue69]

Yes you are.

Your asking this question after reading the case of the lad being thrown out for smoking yet doesn't smoke and never has.

How can that be justified?

 

[Dzeko's Right Boot]

Pretty sure somebody on here will come forward and tell you that they were ejected for actually committing an offence, if that's the correct phrasing. They will accept an ejection is justified, and the right course of action.

But in some cases, like swp80's, then getting kicked out the ground and having your card taken away from you seems a little over the top.

 

[Dave S]

No wonder we can't fill the ground.

 

[MCFCTrick]

if you are caught red handed by a steward smoking/drinking cans in the toilets a ban is 100% justified

in the case of swp80 (and anyone else in this position), assuming he can proove his innocence the ban is completely unjust and compensation should be paid

This ^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Rammyblues]

Why not go the whole hog and condemn them to the Tower of London?!

At least you can smoke in there!!!!!

 

[Lucky Toma]

If I had Fletcher's job and recieved the original e-mail from the lad, the line that would have jumped out at me was the one about not smoking as a hobby or through addiction.
No smoker has ever described smoking as a hobby.

A mistake has been made. Rectify it City.