Bigga
Well-Known Member
RobbieBrewer said:When are some people going to get the fact that the price we paid for Lescott is rendered almost irrelevant?
If our entire yearly transfer budget was £30 million,then yes-paying what we did for Lescott would've been stupid.
But it's not,is it?
As it is-MH wanted the player,the player wanted to come-so we paid the asking price.
From what I've seen so far,Lescott's reading of the game and distribution is far better than Dunne,he's quicker than Distin and at 27 has not yet reached his peak as a centre half.
He's made a few mistakes-but none worse than Wio,"the best defender in the world" has been doing lately at the swamp.
As a team,we're three points off the top with a game in hand,and the more he plays Lescott will get better as he forges an understanding with the rest of the back four.
Give the lad time.
Me, personally, don't give two craps about the price tag. I mention it in relevance to Hughes' willingness to keep playing his buys through periods of shyteness to the detriment of the team.i.e., point losses. Not really a policy I thought any City fan would condone, but hey, its The Messiah, so it's ok.
"Lescott's reading of the game and distribution is far better than Dunne...", so Neds is not?
"...he's quicker than Distin", so Neds is not?
"...and at 27 has not yet reached his peak as a centre half", no fear at all, for Neds there then, who is practically equal to Lescott now!!