supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,891
IMHO he's the best of the era you can remember, and can rightly take his place in the top 3 of himself, real Ronaldo and of course Johan Cruyff.
Ronaldo's injuries prevent him from being regarded as the greatest ever. I watched his documentary on BBC the other day and it reminded me just how exceptional he was. Speed, trickery, power - everything. His injuries were horrific, particularly his knee going again on his return. They show the footage and he's just balling his eyes out and everyone is in complete shock and despair for him. How he recovered from that to play again I do not know. He was told by surgeon's in America they could heal the injury but he wouldn't kick a ball again, so he went back to his French surgeon and somehow managed to get back on the pitch and take Brazil to World Cup glory. A truly remarkable player. He quite probably would have scored at a ratio similar to Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo if he'd have stayed injury free. His record was still exceptional despite that.
It's almost impossible to judge players from different eras. You can suggest things are easier in terms of pitch quality and sports science/tackling now but you could say the professionalism now makes it much harder to stay at the top of your game because there are so many games and tactics have evolved and the general level of top players is much better. The Brazil goal against Italy in the WC final for example - that Italy side had been in a war with West Germany three days before and were dead on their feet. They didn't and couldn't get close to the ball. It was horrific defending as much as brilliant play from Brazil.
Messi's record is just staggering. Beyond anything we've ever seen. Was it harder to score goals in times gone by? I don't think so. Dixie Dean had a pretty stunning ratio! I think, on that basis I'd have to say Messi is the best ever.