Swales lives
Well-Known Member
Now they want to sell our forests, our trees, our land where we walk. Where we get out of the city and feel free from pressure. Is there anything these c*nts won't sell?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Is there anything the tories won't sell?
- Thread starter Swales lives
- Start date
brooklandsblue2.0
Well-Known Member
1) Labour proposed this.
2) They are selling it but at no point will the new owners ever be allowed to build on the land, they will also have to make assurances that they will maintain the forests as well if not better than the F.C currently do.
Back in your left wing box.
2) They are selling it but at no point will the new owners ever be allowed to build on the land, they will also have to make assurances that they will maintain the forests as well if not better than the F.C currently do.
Back in your left wing box.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
So they sell fish tanks?
Hamann Pineapple
Well-Known Member
Who's gonna buy a tree ? I mean what would you do with it ?
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
johnmc said:So they sell fish tanks?
hahahaha,
its labours fault they fucked us over and left us in this mess.
glen quagmire
Well-Known Member
Knowing we are back under a conservative government, helps me sleep better at night!
Swales lives
Well-Known Member
brooklandsblue2.0 said:1) Labour proposed this.
2) They are selling it but at no point will the new owners ever be allowed to build on the land, they will also have to make assurances that they will maintain the forests as well if not better than the F.C currently do.
Back in your left wing box.
1. Wrong, It's the Condems that want to do this. If this was a Labour proposal they could just dismiss it, why would they just carry on with a Labour idea they didn't agree with?
2. Wrong. Privatised forest land can and will almost certainly be used for commercial logging, new golf courses and CenterParc style holiday developments. Stealing the land beneath our feet.
Back in your gimp mask dick-splash.
glen quagmire
Well-Known Member
Swales lives said:brooklandsblue2.0 said:1) Labour proposed this.
2) They are selling it but at no point will the new owners ever be allowed to build on the land, they will also have to make assurances that they will maintain the forests as well if not better than the F.C currently do.
Back in your left wing box.
1. Wrong, It's the Condems that want to do this. If this was a Labour proposal they could just dismiss it, why would they just carry on with a Labour idea they didn't agree with?
2. Wrong. Privatised forest land can and will almost certainly be used for commercial logging, new golf courses and CenterParc style holiday developments. Stealing the land beneath our feet.
Back in your gimp mask dick-splash.
Yes, those big bad torie-dem's creating jobs, out of fucking baron hills and woods! The cunts don't they know that there's a recession on?
Swalesy i'm dissapointed as you are normally one of my fav. posters!
Swales lives
Well-Known Member
glen quagmire said:Swales lives said:1. Wrong, It's the Condems that want to do this. If this was a Labour proposal they could just dismiss it, why would they just carry on with a Labour idea they didn't agree with?
2. Wrong. Privatised forest land can and will almost certainly be used for commercial logging, new golf courses and CenterParc style holiday developments. Stealing the land beneath our feet.
Back in your gimp mask dick-splash.
Yes, those big bad torie-dem's creating jobs, out of fucking baron hills and woods! The cunts don't they know that there's a recession on?
Swalesy i'm dissapointed as you are normally one of my fav. posters!
You surprise me Glen. Have you no love in your soul? No sense of history or poetry in your heart? Ancient woodland where Robin Hood batted for our side to be replaced by fat old men in Pringle jumpers hacking the earth with 9 irons. It's not all about jobs or profit.