Is this the worst take you’ve seen regarding City?

[OntarioBlue]

Ha ha, I’ve never seen that before. That’s hilarious. The three of them should be forced to watch that live on tv now and try to defend themselves. What a bunch of muppets.

 

[CBD]

Thanks for that what a

The below YouTube clip likes this article.

player that run of free kicks was fantastic

 

[Deleted member 77198]

It’s only an opinion, albeit a nonsense one. We all say dumb things from time to time...

These aren’t opinions from these prats, it’s purposeful anti-City bollocks spouted with full agenda.

These clowns are in the jobs they’ve got because they toe the line that those in the background within the media want. The constant stream of negativity before a signing or a game or an achievement, and, when we’ve shown their negativity up to be incorrect, or achieved over and above what anyone has before, it’s either played down or ignored.

How many people have come forward this week with positivity about our newest record, or each week when we win without our best two players, or after the 14 wins in a row to win the title and a quadruple, or after the Centurions and multiple record breaking season?

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Every time Richard Keys opens his mouth he spouts fake news.

He repeatedly blamed City for the draw with liverpool, which had De Jong repeatedly telling him circumstances were different, it took Gray to tell him to shut up.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

“David Silva doesn’t look much like a £30 million player to me.” - Harry Redknapp, August 2010.

Wonder what he thought about Andy Carroll and Christian Benteke then?!

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Ferguson: Can City be top dogs? 'Not in my lifetime'

United manager delivers perfect piece of theatre to dismiss rivals in derby day build-up

www.independent.co.uk

Here’s a good one from old bacon face

 

[LongsightM13]

Ferguson: Can City be top dogs? 'Not in my lifetime'

United manager delivers perfect piece of theatre to dismiss rivals in derby day build-up

www.independent.co.uk

Here’s a good one from old bacon face

An article dripping in pathetic, sycophantic, lickspittle servility from Ian Herbert

 

[The blue phantom]

So they can actually ban somebody when they want, I can't believe that they have only found the need to ban Roan but that explains his piece on Ferran then, Dan Roan king of the bitters.

Yep, That must of seriously pissed City off to actually put a club statement out, I remember some lads launching pies at the **** when he was reporting right on the corner of Asda/Velopark few years ago.

 

[Berts Neck]

I very much agree with all comments, there is very much an agenda against our club. My feeling is that the media, SKY,BT,the press all work on the premis of profit. Most of the UK press is owned by Rothermere,Murdoch and Desmond. They each have their own agendas and do get involved in editorial issues.There are probably racial issues at play too. United and Liverpool will always be the media darlings due to the fact that (for now) have a bigger fanbase and they will always get better coverage. SKY, are owned by Americans (Comcast) and I would imagine close links with Fenway and Glazers as they have US based sports teams under their umbrellas. BT again just wish to appease the majority which is why you see Neville, Keane, Souness etc regularly.Thank heavens for Micah.
There is an approach called the Framing Effect that the media use. They will not say how great City are, but will say how poor Liverpool were in the recent match, as it gets more clicks,more readers. We have been so good that they cant just keep complementing us, they have to spin negative stories (eg FFP) to get more readers or clicks. Hence the negatives we see. Sadly it is all about money, reporter prestige, and not about how well we have done and how much the local community has benefited.

 

[LongsightM13]

There could be an entirely separate thread on FFP bad takes but this, from the Guardian’s ‘Uncle Tom’ David Conn, has to take the prize for the most hypocritical and deranged