Isco

leewill31 said:
Uber Blue said:
robbieh said:
We have signed two players who will complement our side. They are however not Grade 1 players like Kun, Silva, Yaya, Tevez and Kompany.

IMO it's not about signing Grade 1 players, it's about signing players that will make City a Grade 1 team.

i know a lot on here didnt think we would win the title with Barry in the team the rest is history :)

I just find it bizarre that somebody thinks Navas and Fernandinho are somehow inferior players. All this because the people who run City don't think it's best policy to pay over and above want they think to be a good and fair price.

We sign Isco great; if we don't I'll get over it and look forward to seeing who else comes in, happy in the knowledge that we have already signed two belting players who are going to improve us.
 
lost_n_spaced said:
For the record, and so we're clear, I don't claim to be an ITK and so care very little (other than for the fact that I'd really like us to sign him) about whether THE INFORMATION POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM BY ANOTHER POSTER is correct or not.

Feel free to hold me in lower regard if Isco isn't a City player by this evening / goes to Real.

:D
Cheers
 
I think we shouldn't be getting too carried away with the effect of the RVPussy signing. Utd won the title with 89pts; same as we (and they) had the previous season. Difference was that our top striker was out and/or not at his absolute best for much of last season.
If you factor in the effect that evidently some players just didn't seem to get on with Mancini, then I would expect an improvement pointswise simply by the appointment of Pellegrini, regardless of signings.
If Nasri doesn't pull out of the wall in the derby, we grab a stuffy goal away to QPR and win our last game at home to Norwich, then it's a 3 point gap. Doesn't need massive changes. Chelsea need to be watched though.
 
M24 Citizen said:
Ray78 said:
lost_n_spaced said:
For the record, and so we're clear, I don't claim to be an ITK and so care very little (other than for the fact that I'd really like us to sign him) about whether THE INFORMATION POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM BY ANOTHER POSTER is correct or not.

Feel free to hold me in lower regard if Isco isn't a City player by this evening / goes to Real.

:D

I can confirm that as well :).

I have no idea what he's trying to say?

me neither
 
fallowfield said:
You think its good stuff when someone bashing fellow city fans for their emotions? Because thats excatly what we are dealing with, strong emotions, it just show how much ppl invest in their club and im not talking about money but feelings/emotions,time. If someone think fans in here just write things for the fun of it then they are way off track. its the emotions that take control in this kind of situations. some are better to keep them to themselves than others we are all different.

So please dont make fun of other city fans for express themselves.
 
ped said:
dannyburns4 said:
ped said:
no body has cocked up ,it looks like he had a choice between madrid and city ,he chose real,why does there have to be a scapegoat,i f****ing dispare
He hasn't chosen anyone yet other ways it would be all over ssn and the likes
my mistake,your correct,its just annoying,that 1 or 2 posters are talking of cock ups and f***k ups ,when we all know f.a


As I say IMO it is obvious the manager wanted ISCO and that deal was done ages ago - The people negotiating should have got the deal done before the U21s. Unless you are ITK how do you know we haven't c*cked up
 
We've added fernandinho and navas, yet some people are getting upset over a player rejecting us. Basing on last seasons performances, we lacked width and needed a midfielder with pace. Sorted. Now we need a striker, cavani was our main target but over priced. I'm sure we won't fail in getting our squad ready before the first game, still well over a month till kick off.
 
andrewmswift said:
Ray78 said:
lost_n_spaced said:
For the record, and so we're clear, I don't claim to be an ITK and so care very little (other than for the fact that I'd really like us to sign him) about whether THE INFORMATION POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM BY ANOTHER POSTER is correct or not.

Feel free to hold me in lower regard if Isco isn't a City player by this evening / goes to Real.

:D

I can confirm that as well :).

does this mean you're saying he's coming or not?

It means that I wouldn't have the first idea as I am not ITK, and that the poster of the original info on another board has posted nothing positive or negative since.

It really is like The Life Of Brian here sometimes....

'You don't need to follow ME, you don't NEED to follow ANYBODY. You're all individuals'

'Yes, we're all individuals'.
 
jake28 said:
berniethebusman said:
jake28 said:

We got him manuel pellegrini

Let hope you are right,I'm not quite so sure he will be the game changer many seem to think. Don't get me wrong,he may well get that extra bit out of the players but a manager can only do so much. I think if we don't strengthen our forward line we will come up short regardless of what Pellegrini can bring. Just my take on it.

Take the little bit he adds and the large chunk (my opinion) mancini took away & thats quite the improvement already, thats not even factoring any transfers. Guess we'll find out next season one thing im sure of as much as id liked to have signed isco i dont think he'd be the game changer you were looking for, he's not there yet.
... & were not behind man utd in personnel just performance, just my take on it. :)
 
lost_n_spaced said:
andrewmswift said:
Ray78 said:
I can confirm that as well :).

does this mean you're saying he's coming or not?

It means that I wouldn't have the first idea as I am not ITK, and that the poster of the original info on another board has posted nothing positive or negative since.

It really is like The Life Of Brian here sometimes....

'You don't need to follow ME, you don't NEED to follow ANYBODY. You're all individuals'

'Yes, we're all individuals'.

so some poster on another board claimed isco will be signed tonight (Tuesday)?
 
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.

A bunch of the City bloggers on Twitter love taking the piss out of Bluemoon, which they of course are too good to post on. Hi guys. :)
 
zeven said:
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.
This i agree with you to 100 per cent. fucking tasteless blog if you ask me.
Same, I get what he was trying to say, it was just slightly condescending.
 
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.

The writer of that blog, Howie, is a regular poster on the other forum that I frequent.

Excellent writer, purveyor of a mean header when walking home pissed playing imaginary football & good all round chap.
 
LoveCity said:
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.

A bunch of the City bloggers on Twitter love taking the piss out of Bluemoon, which they of course are too good to post on. Hi thundercunts!. :)
 
LoveCity said:
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.

A bunch of the City bloggers on Twitter love taking the piss out of Bluemoon, which they of course are too good to post on. Hi guys. :)

Pantie sniffing nomarks.. ignore them..riff raff is all they are.
 
zeven said:
baldybouncer said:
fallowfield said:

No it's not good stuff at all, and I don't like people making comments on my behalf. I'm not in the least "hurting bad". So Howard and your blog can fuck right off.
This i agree with you to 100 per cent. fucking tasteless blog if you ask me.

Made me smile, thanks
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top