Middle East Conflict



“River to the sea for me, but not for thee”


A ridiculous stance to take from Netanyahu but what aim does Hamas have for the post war landscape and what part of Israel exists for them?

That’s the issue here, 2 sides who have now been pushed to the point where right now, there is no middle ground, no trust, just hatred and a desire to see their own side win outright with no thought whatsoever for the opposite.
 
A ridiculous stance to take from Netanyahu but what aim does Hamas have for the post war landscape and what part of Israel exists for them?

That’s the issue here, 2 sides who have now been pushed to the point where right now, there is no middle ground, no trust, just hatred and a desire to see their own side win outright with no thought whatsoever for the opposite.

When both sides can’t negotiate in good faith then a third party has to step in. It was done to the Bosnians and it will have to be done in Israel/Palestine.
 
When both sides can’t negotiate in good faith then a third party has to step in. It was done to the Bosnians and it will have to be done in Israel/Palestine.
The third party cannot be the US or Britain for obvious reasons. Who would take this on?
 
When both sides can’t negotiate in good faith then a third party has to step in. It was done to the Bosnians and it will have to be done in Israel/Palestine.

It will be America but it’s not just two sides, it’s a sovereign nation governed by a right wing crackpot right now that can and should be changed and what should also be a sovereign nation in its own right, governed by a terrorist organisation that you simply can not negotiate with or allow to continue.

Its almost an impossible task it feels trying to solve this mess out.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.