It's Quiet 10 no apologies! (continued)

[Rammyblues]

The question really is if you have information about incoming players or outgoing players which don't materialise can you ever be considered on here to be ITK. If I said Guidetti on loan to Sunderland and Milner and AJ to Sunderland as well, would that information be ITK if say only Guidetti signed for Sunderland but the other two didn't even though there may be contact by Sunderland for all three?

 

[80s Shorts]

The question really is if you have information about incoming players or outgoing players which don't materialise can you ever be considered on here to be ITK. If I said Guidetti on loan to Sunderland and Milner and AJ to Sunderland as well, would that information be ITK if say only Guidetti signed for Sunderland but the other two didn't even though there may be contact by Sunderland for all three?

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?<br /><br />-- Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:44 pm --<br /><br />

Where was it confirmed ?

Presume somewhere in the Sinclair thread, can't remember tbh.

So it wasnt confirmed then. Thanks.

 

[Rammyblues]

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?

Posed as a question, and would certainly never wum on here.

 

[80s Shorts]

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?

Posed as a question, and would certainly never wum on here.

Should hope not.

 

[Rammy Blue]

The question really is if you have information about incoming players or outgoing players which don't materialise can you ever be considered on here to be ITK. If I said Guidetti on loan to Sunderland and Milner and AJ to Sunderland as well, would that information be ITK if say only Guidetti signed for Sunderland but the other two didn't even though there may be contact by Sunderland for all three?

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?

-- Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:44 pm --

Where was it confirmed ?

Presume somewhere in the Sinclair thread, can't remember tbh.

So it wasnt confirmed then. Thanks.

Quit the smartarse remarks.

I had the decency to reply to your post even though, if you notice, I put a question mark after my comment in the previous post.

Just because I can't be arsed searching for it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

 

[80s Shorts]

The question really is if you have information about incoming players or outgoing players which don't materialise can you ever be considered on here to be ITK. If I said Guidetti on loan to Sunderland and Milner and AJ to Sunderland as well, would that information be ITK if say only Guidetti signed for Sunderland but the other two didn't even though there may be contact by Sunderland for all three?

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?

-- Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:44 pm --

Presume somewhere in the Sinclair thread, can't remember tbh.

So it wasnt confirmed then. Thanks.

Quit the smartarse remarks.

I had the decency to reply to your post even though, if you notice, I put a question mark after my comment in the previous post.

Just because I can't be arsed searching for it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

No not smartarse, just calling you out for a flawed argument you are using to support one of your posts. It seems strange to me that Sinclair was touring round the Etihad and Carrington and yet there is no pictorial evidence. Did they sneak them in in a laundry basket.

 

[Theo555]

Wsn't it Sinclairs girlfriends birthday and she tweeted about spending the day at the beach with her boyfriend!

 

[svennis pennis]

Tolmie would love the idea that everyone on here mass debates over his every word.

 

[80s Shorts]

Tolmie would love the idea that everyone on here mass debates over his every word.

No doubt.

 

[BillyShears]

One out of three would be a start. Are you saying this or are you wumming?

-- Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:44 pm --



So it wasnt confirmed then. Thanks.

Quit the smartarse remarks.

I had the decency to reply to your post even though, if you notice, I put a question mark after my comment in the previous post.

Just because I can't be arsed searching for it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

No not smartarse, just calling you out for a flawed argument you are using to support one of your posts. It seems strange to me that Sinclair was touring round the Etihad and Carrington and yet there is no pictorial evidence. Did they sneak them in in a laundry basket.

Not the Etihad, just Carrington. There is no pictorial evidence as there were no independent photographers within the Carrington complex on the day in question. Sharon was there but I don't think she'd be in a job if she took pictures of everyone who walked through the door then sold them to the highest paying tabloid rag. Anyway, it's a moot point as those who have a raging hard on for Tolmie and other ITK's will never give a shit about how things work and would much rather live in a pretty shallow "i wuz right you wuz wrong" world.