yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
Our loss ratio when Zin plays is extremely low.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 16 - Txiki grinders
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Lol
Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,525
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
i actually think he is a great player and would of been superb for us, i'm sure i read hes got 18 months left on his contract,if that's true and if he wont sign a new deal this summer would be the time to sell himJorginho isn’t being replaced anytime soon
Nicholas van Whatsisface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 2,717
Yet was happy to negotiate an extension for the same player, alongside another of his players at City (Ederson) last summer.
He must have been furious!
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,187
Can someone explain the difference between 'real' and 'announced' value?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I read that as it's an obvious move for us to try and broker it, rather than FDJ begging for the move.FDJ *wants* City over Barca? First I've heard that.
abu13
Well-Known Member
Wasn't it something to do with Otto being used as a make weight.Can someone explain the difference between 'real' and 'announced' value?
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Real value is when everything is added into a transfer or as I like to phrase it "when city sign someone"Can someone explain the difference between 'real' and 'announced' value?
Fee.
Wages.
Bonuses.
Announced value is when the media tell everyone a player cost 30m plus add ons, when really it cost 60m or as I like to phrase it "when utd sign someone".
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Real value being net of Otamendi, announced value being purely Dias fee.Can someone explain the difference between 'real' and 'announced' value?
It's quite terrible phrased so I can see the confusion, this is what passed.Can someone explain the difference between 'real' and 'announced' value?
City gave Otamendi + 50m for Dias. So the "Real" value of 50m is how much money actually exchanged.
City and Benfica decided Otamendi was worth 21.6m which Benfica added to the 50m to say City paid a total of 71.6m in assets (money + player) which is what they "Announced".
- Status
- Not open for further replies.