It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread

If Chelsea offer £45 - £50m then I think City will accept.
It's good money for a player that has only one year left on his contact. We bought him for £50m won numerous trophies with him at the club, Seven years later sell him for the same price...Good business.

I think it's a bad move for Raheem to Chelsea being honest, Chelsea play with wing backs so normally only room for two forward men through the middle and I don't think playing the centre forward role suits Raheem. Chelsea don't play with wide men as they use James and Alonso/Chilwell to do those jobs.
 
How has Tuchel agreed terms with a player who is contracted to us? Does that not constitute an illegal approach?
It does but the rule is unworkable and so it never comes into play. The way it was initially circumvented was that clubs would just say they didn’t approach the player it was an agency making enquires rather than the club themselves. It’s impossible to police.
 
It's good money for a player that has only one year left on his contact. We bought him for £50m won numerous trophies with him at the club, Seven years later sell him for the same price...Good business.

I think it's a bad move for Raheem to Chelsea being honest, Chelsea play with wing backs so normally only room for two forward men through the middle and I don't think playing the centre forward role suits Raheem. Chelsea don't play with wide men as they use James and Alonso/Chilwell to do those jobs.
Agreed it is a good deal for City and I think a move which will appeal to Sterling, returning to London and to a Chelsea team playing in the CL. As for his role in the team, I think Tuchel would probably play him as a striker which like you say perhaps is not best suited to him.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.