Really? I'd think it'd be the opposite for adding depth. They'd want to stay where they are getting to play every single week to make their respective teams.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
In what way?I think the World Cup actually presents some good opportunities for transfers that wouldn’t have otherwise
NorthamptonBlue
Well-Known Member
This is not what his report says
What does it say?
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
What about those who aren’t getting the exposure they want?Really? I'd think it'd be the opposite for adding depth. They'd want to stay where they are getting to play every single week to make their respective teams.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
As I posted in the Jesus thread, it says we want €60M and an agreement wouldn’t he reached for less than €50M. It’s nothing new, really.What does it say?
ShedDweller
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2021
- Messages
- 814
- Team supported
- City
It wasn't so long ago that we would buy up Arsenal's fringe players.
Times have indeed changed.
Times have indeed changed.
SWPISHOME
Well-Known Member
Gabby is worth a lot more than £42m.I would snap Arsenal's hand off for 42 million for Jesus.
City special, "we want 60 mil for this guy but will settle for 50 mil, now give us 40 mil or we have no deal."As I posted in the Jesus thread, it says we want €60M and an agreement wouldn’t he reached for less than €50M. It’s nothing new, really.