citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,455
Swings and roundabouts though isn't it?
Buy first - get stung selling
Sell first - get stung buying
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
Buy first - get stung selling
Sell first - get stung buying
Goater=Legend
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Apr 2006
- Messages
- 6,727
What if we cant sell them in the summer? We will end up having players that are surplus to requirements and won't be playing until January at least.But the other side of the argument is not letting players go until we get replacements in mate? It weakens your position when clubs know you have to buy a player for a position?
The gap is much bigger than we realise perhapsSo essentially weve decided to stand still this window and let the rivals try close the gap.
B
B
BrazilianGus
Guest
I am not being negative, I am saying I believe we will do in the market what needs to be done. Like last year — without the deadline day signing we don’t win shit. The people who are bending over backwards to claim we don’t need anything are the ones who are actually being negative by preemptively coming up with excuses because they think nothing will happen, and don’t want to be in a position to criticize; they are the ones who don’t have faith in the club.And how’d that work out in terms of saving our ass? :-) we cannot set out on negativity after the season we’ve had. Impossible. Not one team in Europe let alone prem has a core stronger than ours. I would like for a couple new names to be added but it’s genuinely no doom and gloom situation.
T
T
Tony - MCFC
Guest
Perhaps but right now do we need someone that badly? I want Gvardiol but is it a necessity? Same in midfield, for Mahrez which is probably more of a need.But the other side of the argument is not letting players go until we get replacements in mate? It weakens your position when clubs know you have to buy a player for a position?
City won’t play games, they will pay what they see fit, if clubs take the piss, City walk away, that won’t change. City are not desperate, certainly not right now.
B
B
BrazilianGus
Guest
It really isn’tThe gap is much bigger than we realise perhaps
we can’t stand still and we need to keep evolving mate. If you look at Utd and fergie every season they signed players to keep the squad on there toes and by bringing in fresher hungrier players who haven’t won titles it keeps if going .It’s crazy to think people believed we’d massively just change the squad around because we’ve done a treble. Our core is far too strong right now, it is just a case of having depth and improving if there’s an opportunity. Genuinely baffles me people thought we’d splash on many names without outgoings first.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
The 115 lies has done us this window. Wankers achieved what they set out to do with the constant smear campaign.
We are a football outcast.
We are a football outcast.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 28,163
Perhaps but right now do we need someone that badly? I want Gvardiol but is it a necessity? Same in midfield, for Mahrez which is probably more of a need.
City won’t play games, they will pay what they see fit, if clubs take the piss, City walk away, that won’t change. City are not desperate, certainly not right now.
Gvardiol is the new system target it seems mate and we defo need a Mahrez replacement. I also worry about our reliance on KDB to supply ammunition for Erling as well?
Football never works on paper mate, 3 years winning this league on the bounce is enough evidence. We operate on a much higher level than the rest.It really isn’t