Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
I don’t doubt it. My original point was that Angelino didn’t make it in the first team twice regardless of whether it was a huge gamble or monetary considerations.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
I get your point but there is no harm in bringing back our old players for the right price. If Southampton aren't taking the piss then Lavia wouldn't be a bad option. Especially if we secure Bernie for another couple of seasons.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Of course. I’m saying I’m not sure Lavia is the best player for us and, just because he used to play for us, it makes him more attractive.
I could be wrong but I don’t see him as City standard.
But if we sign Paqueta, what terrible United player will Moyes replace him with? Fred?
Kalvin Phillips hopefully ;)
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Probably a loan, can't see Marseille having north of 30m to spend
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,538
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Not if he wants to stay in a job .
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Even worse ... McTominay.
Really? Two good players yes. Two good players we want to spend £120m on… no thanks.
I’d rather go with what we have and spend bigger on better quality next season. Neither are game changers.