It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?

But almost every other club has a backup for a striker. I don't see why Watkins and Isak can have backups but Haaland can't? They don't have to be world class or stay for years, we could have gone to South America and got a young striker for 2 years like we did Alvarez. Give them the league cup, FA cup, easier UCL matches, can sub on when we need a goal, or to rest Haaland when he is not fully fit. We play so many games wouldn't be hard to get games.
But eventually players would want more of the a look in rather than be constantly rotated. Watkins will want to be the main striker and not be content with being second billing.
 
Another striker is the least of our priorities. We had the likes of Jesus and Alavrez (who did show flashes) but not enough to move Haaland out of the team or not quite good enough to really nail down a place. It is near enough impossible to find a player who is content in being cover. Veterans who are winding down their careers could fit the bill but again would they want lesser wagers or a role. Same with up and coming strikers as well.

Mo Kudus
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.