No he is not , but granted he is not great either
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
No he is not , but granted he is not great either
If the Borges fee is accurate, I make that £74m brought in already, not including any add-ons.
Mahrez £26m
Trafford £15m
Borges £14m
Charles £10.5m
Porro sell-on £8m
C. Doyle loan fee £0.5m
Still have THB and Tommy Doyle likely to go plus 20% of Lavia’s fee plus whatever combination of Walker, Laporte, Cancelo, and (hopefully not) Bernardo would bring in.
Not sure we’d get much from any other sales, and haven’t seen fees anywhere on Herrera, Slicker, or Rogers.
Mahrez £26m
Trafford £15m
Borges £14m
Charles £10.5m
Porro sell-on £8m
C. Doyle loan fee £0.5m
Still have THB and Tommy Doyle likely to go plus 20% of Lavia’s fee plus whatever combination of Walker, Laporte, Cancelo, and (hopefully not) Bernardo would bring in.
Not sure we’d get much from any other sales, and haven’t seen fees anywhere on Herrera, Slicker, or Rogers.
That really is great business and not that I think we should take less for first team players but it takes pressure of the sales with still getting wages of the books.If the Borges fee is accurate, I make that £74m brought in already, not including any add-ons.
Mahrez £26m
Trafford £15m
Borges £14m
Charles £10.5m
Porro sell-on £8m
C. Doyle loan fee £0.5m
Still have THB and Tommy Doyle likely to go plus 20% of Lavia’s fee plus whatever combination of Walker, Laporte, Cancelo, and (hopefully not) Bernardo would bring in.
Not sure we’d get much from any other sales, and haven’t seen fees anywhere on Herrera, Slicker, or Rogers.
Was just doing the maths myself, I thought Charles was 15m and Trafford was 19m though.If the Borges fee is accurate, I make that £74m brought in already, not including any add-ons.
Mahrez £26m
Trafford £15m
Borges £14m
Charles £10.5m
Porro sell-on £8m
C. Doyle loan fee £0.5m
Still have THB and Tommy Doyle likely to go plus 20% of Lavia’s fee plus whatever combination of Walker, Laporte, Cancelo, and (hopefully not) Bernardo would bring in.
Not sure we’d get much from any other sales, and haven’t seen fees anywhere on Herrera, Slicker, or Rogers.
Either way we must have some serious dosh floating around. Won’t be at all surprised to see us break even on net spend this summer
horlock_was_super
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 3,611
- Location
- In complete despair at 93:19
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
Phil the Face is on a free too!Anthony? Sancho? WTF?
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
Rogers & Slicker went for undisclosed fees as well you can throw in, when we find them outIf the Borges fee is accurate, I make that £74m brought in already, not including any add-ons.
Mahrez £26m
Trafford £15m
Borges £14m
Charles £10.5m
Porro sell-on £8m
C. Doyle loan fee £0.5m
Still have THB and Tommy Doyle likely to go plus 20% of Lavia’s fee plus whatever combination of Walker, Laporte, Cancelo, and (hopefully not) Bernardo would bring in.
Not sure we’d get much from any other sales, and haven’t seen fees anywhere on Herrera, Slicker, or Rogers.
Was just doing the maths myself, I thought Charles was 15m and Trafford was 19m though.
Either way we must have some serious dosh floating around. Won’t be at all surprised to see us break even on net spend this summer
I noted the reported fees without add-ons included.
better dead than red
Well-Known Member
Thank you. Yes, I would assume he be able to play more if he's fit and doing well in training. My question was, essentially, how the 1000 more minutes number was arrived at knowing he had health issues.He officially missed five, but in the next five he came off the bench just for a token minutes, so clearly wasn't fit.
He also missed, or had restricted minutes, in another 10 games, due to his foot injury.
If needed, he's probably at the stage where he can put in 3500+ minutes, if he stays fit.
Are you for fucking real?Why not sancho? It’s not clicking for him at United but I’m sure if we got him we could get the best out of him. He can play both sides and fits perfectly the profile of a ball retention winger that we need.
The gripe United fans have with sancho is because he’s not as incisive and all action as players like Antony, rashford and garnacho. He prefers to combine and build play like a wide playmaker like Grealish.
Yes, we know how he left but he was 16-17, young and wanted exposure to 1st team football which we couldn’t offer. Now he’s more established and mature and could really be a great fit for us. Only issue I see is wages. I don’t know what United were doing giving him that high of wages.
better dead than red
Well-Known Member
I don't have an answer for your question. I was just curious about how OP had arrived at his number knowing (I assume) Foden had health issues.And how much exactly of Mahrez’s time are we deeming as nothing…