It beats the mind really. @Topbins clearly cannot see the difference in Sterling who has moved from a very good player to a top 2 or 3 EPL player bearing in mind that the trajectory in his movement hasn't always been upwards between the time he played in that SSS (Suarez, Sturridge, Sterling) attack and now.Are you actually a city fan??? If you don’t think pep has had a major influence on raz then you are unbelievably strange and naive
Pochettino is famed for growing talents. I'll give you that but what has he won? Nothing! Even in Arsenal/Chelsea's darkest moments, they have some silverware to show for it. And please do not mention VVD or Becker who were established stars and went for record sums. Klopp is a fantastic manager but I'd put it to you that if Pep had managed to be trophyless or only won Carabao in his second season, he would have been long gone unlike Klopp who has had a lot of time on his side despite winning nothing up until recently.Your right.
Spot in actually.
The point I'm making is that Pep ain't plucking these players from Leyton Orient, the ability is already there more often than not we are talking seasoned or regular internationals which Sterling was when we bought him. He has improved under Pep but there is a context to it, one of which is that he was class prior to us buying him. This is perhaps the reason why we spent 50 million on him.
I say all this because you are trying to discredit Pep's work. Pellers was an is a good man but did you witness this level of dominance with City? Also what is the rate of success of his signings compared to Pep? If Pep was available today there is hardly any club that wouldn't jostle to sign him up. He wins but he also wins well playing with a fantastic style. Jose, Conte had wins but their wins even bored their owner to death.
If you mention Pep having money, have you mentioned Klopp having time? More money comes with more expectation and th attendant pressure.
Give it a rest fella.