It's Quiet - a new dawn

Status
Not open for further replies.
And if we're not winning 3-0? we're not going to smash every midtable side every game.

Lets say we line up with the starting 11 today, we've got Foden and DIaz on the bench every game as you say, then we've got Bravo too as the keeper option. We've now got 4 more options and the likes of Mendy,Walker,Fernandinho,Gundogan,Bernardo,Sterling and others to fit in. Who misses out? For balance you'd probably have Fernandinho Walker Mendy and Sterling from that so then the likes of Bernardo and Gundogan don't even make the bench every week. Then what happens when we're not winning 3-0, it's 0-0 and we look completely flat, or we're losing 1-0 from a counter and are struggling to break them down, we rely on Diaz and Foden from the bench to be the sparks to create something?

Said this in the post match thread, If they are kept, which i believe they will be, they'll get cup games, potentially dead rubber champs league group games and maybe make the bench a handful of times when injuries/suspensions are taking their toll. They're great prospects but at the big boys table in a team fighting for titles you have to treat them like any other member of the 1st team squad and ask the question, are they a better option than anybody else available? in the scenario above, that'd be Gundogan and Bernardo, but it could easily be Silva,KDB or a few others, and as good as they've been and look, they're clearly not.

Pep has handled them brilliantly so far, lets just leave him to continue handling them however he see's fit. If they see game time, he clearly believes they're currently good enough or even better than our other options, in which case great, we've got a superb player for nothing who makes us better. But if we don't see them much if at all, it will be because Pep clearly feels we have better options at that time and they'll have to bide their time

7 subs named, if we cant put a couple of kids on the bench each week we may as well give up on the academy, I'm not saying we will be winning each week by 3 or so but we will be sometimes, when we are give them a go, otherwise we will never let Roberts or Foden or Tosin or Diaz fulfill their potential. And at 0-0 maybe they can have a Macheda or Janujaz moment though hopefully they'll not then end up at Sunderland ;0)
 
Your example doesn't prove your point at all. "he" left as it became clear that it couldn't be done like that any more. He was so desperate to compete with City he wouldn't even give Pogba a chance, while trotting out a number of over the hill options game after game. Pogba was widely considered the best young talent in the game at the time he left, and walked right into the Juventus starting line up.
You need to look over his career as a whole. Like many despots, his best years were past when he stepped down. But yes, I'm pleased to agree that City rattled him and pushed him into a more expedient type of management towards the end; Van Rapist and the Ginger Pig being classic examples.
 
Congratulations on three excellent posts.

Much as I despised the old cnut, my namesake showed it could be done. Regrettably, it's the clubs who are accused of financial doping, of whom we are one, who play it safe by resorting to the cheque book to paper over every crack. This uncritical "club knows best" mentality is bollocks and failing to nourish young, home-grown talent is bad for football.

Baloney. Pure baloney.
 
The class of 92 as we all know were poached from other academies city, Oldham, bury, etc

Being the big daddy they were.

It's a myth that Utd were some super power in bringing through kids. It's even more frustrating that it's being used on fucking city forum by some to support an argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.