It's Quiet Corrections

[ricky77]

Sorry can't remember which topic bit I think I read tolmies say that 1 player had signed a pre contract agreement somewhere and that it was probably obvious who this was. I may have missed something but it ain't obvious to me. I was thinking boateng but in tolmies earlier thread where he talked about these 3 agreed deals boateng was not one of them. Could someone fill me in if I have missed something. Have we all a good idea who this player would be. Thanks

 

[Pearce_out]

After speaking with City execs last night I can confirm that we have not signed 3 players, we have not even signed one. Although they were very reluctant to give anything away about transfers they did hint that one deal might be advanced in negotiations and that 2 others were under discussion. I read between the lines on what they said that we are after a superstar defender probably a left back.

They said alot more but I have already put it on another forum and can't be arsed to answer the million and one questions about it that i will get here no doubt if I did.

mad zab i can only go off his original post, nothing above suggests to me that he is saying itk's are full of shit? i took the correction bit to be about deals not being signed when there have been posts on its quiet stating done deals have been made for three players, thats how i see it anyhow

That is exactly how it was supposed to be perceived, you have the nail on the head.

 

[ox-blue]

Sorry can't remember which topic bit I think I read tolmies say that 1 player had signed a pre contract agreement somewhere and that it was probably obvious who this was. I may have missed something but it ain't obvious to me. I was thinking boateng but in tolmies earlier thread where he talked about these 3 agreed deals boateng was not one of them. Could someone fill me in if I have missed something. Have we all a good idea who this player would be. Thanks

This

 

[Chippy_boy]

The title of the thread has not exactly helped the flow of it, I would offer?

Corrections, can be interpreted in many ways. Contradictions, would probably have been more suitable?

And surely would have remained valid within the 'It's quiet thread', rather than as a separate stand-alone?

If nothing else, it increases the division on here, unless the original aim, on the part of the OP, was to somehow provide him with a platform to rub others' noses in it? Sincere apologies should this likely not be the case.

Pearcey is clearly an intelligent poster, showing plenty of respect in his subsequent responses.

But he is naive, as are some others, in the extreme, to suggest the club policy line is somehow opaque.

Two words - Mark Hughes - and I can tell you for a fact that the club were lying to his face well before he was dismissed.

In fact, all the fans were deceived, as club officials remained tight-lipped throughout the so-called dead-man walking period.

In itself, perpetuating a blatant lie.

I would not say they have lied during the meeting, as some others may have, only that they are being extremely econonical with the truth, to serve an agenda, for the good of the club.

The original thread was pulled for a reason, along with Peacey's more than valid opinions, is it also not beyond the realms to consider the club want this version out in the public domain for very real reasons!

cheers

There is probably quite alot of sense in that thread even though I was labled as naieve :P

And crap at spelling

 

[mancitypj]

Let's just wait and see, shall we. Eventually we will find out who is right and who is wrong. That's what all this boils down to, isn't it.

 

[mad zab]

If that is the case then who is he correcting? After all this is what hsi thread is all about!!

Also last night he told everyone about his suspicions of people posting that we had agreed contracts etc and would ask the execs at the OSC he was attending.

So because they tell him everything on here is shit, he then makes a thread to attack certain posters on here.

-- Fri May 21, 2010 5:22 pm --



That's because I call a spade a spade and don't give a fuck who I upset!!

I don't care for somebody like you thinking that but if that is how Tolmie and Ajay see it then I appologise to them as that is not how it was meant. I see no problem in putting forward some info that was actually wtinessed by a room full of people so we know it is legitimate within reason. People can look at this information and make their own mind up as to what to believe.

If I was here to discredit them I would have failed to mention what they said about 3 signings that ties in with what Tolmie and Ajay have said.

Your whole post was to discredit them.

So please don't give me that BS about trying to give them credit now, after others had pointed out that they had been speaking about 3 players, but differed in their views at what stages they were at.

I will ask you again what forum are you from? Personally I think if you don't answer, then you should be banned anyway!!

 

[Pearce_out]

mad zab that sounds logical, getting banned for adhering to the rules of the forum, you seem to be making lots of sense today. Anyway I have tried to discuss sensibly what this thread is about and now I realise that I am wasting my time. So if you don't mind I will just miss out replying to you from now on.

Thanks.

 

[blue12]

So in a nutshell please can i have it in lamens terms are the three players we have signed or possibly have signed or maybe not signed at all worth getting excited about ?

 

[mad zab]

So what forum will get you banned?

I guess it is a forum that shits on bluemoon every chance it gets Gav?

It is not either of those mentioned it is a small forum. And it's not bluemoon I have a problem with it is certain posters who show a lack of respect for others.

You mean like you?<br /><br />-- Fri May 21, 2010 5:42 pm --<br /><br />

After speaking with City execs last night I can confirm that we have not signed 3 players, we have not even signed one. Although they were very reluctant to give anything away about transfers they did hint that one deal might be advanced in negotiations and that 2 others were under discussion. I read between the lines on what they said that we are after a superstar defender probably a left back.

They said alot more but I have already put it on another forum and can't be arsed to answer the million and one questions about it that i will get here no doubt if I did.

mad zab i can only go off his original post, nothing above suggests to me that he is saying itk's are full of shit? i took the correction bit to be about deals not being signed when there have been posts on its quiet stating done deals have been made for three players, thats how i see it anyhow

If that was the case then it only shows him to be a gullible fool, if he really believes that people from the club will verify one way or the other if we are in for certain players at a public forum. They probably just said we are in advanced negotiations for one player just to placate him!!

However, I believe he has other motives!!

 

[Pearce_out]

Anyway I'm going now. Goodbye