27 is too old to be spending well over 100 million on a player, and yaya is a terrible example. Yes he was great those first four years but he has done very little since, as well as being absolutely useless these past two years. If anything I think that supports my argument when you factor in that Yaya cost us 30 but Chelsea could easily ask 5x that for hazard.
How do you know who didn't fuck up the chelsea dressing room? I think its more than likely the best player on the team played at least some role in stabbing two managers in the back out of 6 years. Yes its speculation but the balance of probability is in my favour. Especially when you look at how much effort he put in against us, didn't even try to carry them in the games that really mattered.
Yes you are correct none of the players we have been linked with has set the world on fire in the champions league, but all of them have played fewer games than Hazard, some have never had the chance to play and in Mahrez case he only got one chance and did pretty well. I accept you can argue this one either way though, I was just reacting to a few people suggesting he could take us to the next level in that competition and I disagree because he's never managed it with chelsea.
The random bloke who started the whole hazard conversation today tweeted he could cost us Aguero, I didn't just pull it out of my arse mate.