It's Quiet the £250m return

Frimpong isn't a city reject, no more than Delap , Palmer, Lavia etc. are.
A young player moving onto another club, usually by mutual agreement with the player and the 2 clubs, is a normal transfer procedure.
He was not good enough at the time.

Palmer and Lavia were good enough they just decided to go elsewhere.

Delap was streets ahead of Frimpong at the youth levels. He got more chances to prove himself but ultimately he was not good enough either.

Frimpong was at lower level than the above. Right now he might be higher rated than Delap. But the other two have far superior ability now and then.
 
He certainly has some of the attributes we need. A glaring deficiency in our squad is the lack of pace in midfield, especially when tasked with running back to defend. However, I’d much rather save the not inconsiderable money it would take to bring him from Nottingham and sign Bouaddi from Lille instead, either in the winter or next summer.
When it comes to breaking up cou ters rodri has 5 yards in his head I also see gonzalez being the same they will have seen the danger and dealt with it before its lead to anything. We also have more pace at the back now to deal with these breaks.
 
That doesn't mean Delap and Frimpong are rejects.
Callum Doyle may well be sold this window but I doubt you could class him as a reject.
I think we just perceive reject differently. For me it is just a player we deem not good enough for us. They could still be a very good top league player. I think Callum Doyle is similar example clearly a talented footballer but he will probably reach his peak at mid table PL side.

Lavia and Palmer clearly had the ability to play for us they were impatient or we were not trusting enough in them.

We have rarely got it wrong when shipping out young players (rejecting). The only time I feel we lost out is when they wanted/forced the move Lavia, Palmer, Brahim Diaz, olise, gittens, and sancho.
 
When it comes to breaking up cou ters rodri has 5 yards in his head I also see gonzalez being the same they will have seen the danger and dealt with it before its lead to anything. We also have more pace at the back now to deal with these breaks.
I recently re-watched the games against Real Madrid (23-24) and then Internazionale (24-25) and it was evident then that Rodri was already struggling to get back when we lost possession in the opponent’s half, and that was before he suffered his season-ending injury. That’s not criticism, merely acknowledging where we have a vulnerability. Gonzalez, for all his other attributes, is not quick. We’ve seen us lose possession in games and his first instinct is to grab the player and take the booking, because he knows he’s not catching them. Porto fans came on here and cautioned us about that side of his game, no pun intended. The new defenders might help, though there’s currently no guarantee they’ll all remain. Our squad is now much stronger, but every side has a weakness, and if the opposition deliberately sets the trap and dispossess us in front of its own box, it knows that 5 players running at pace will rapidly expose our defence.

As I’ve said, we’ll be comparatively comfortable domestically, but in Europe, I expect Barcelona, PSG, and Real Madrid, teams blessed with multiple fast players, to expose that vulnerability. Our cause isn’t helped by the fact that we’ll likely face them after the domestic season has taken its toll.
 
I'm not arguing he doesn't, necessarily. But the extra year of contract was triggered by the number of games he played last year. And what you argue would have been daft, to not play him in a season we had so many injuries to key players, because it means he can go for free this year.

Any part he may have this season has now changed with the addition of Reijnders and Gonzales, and some extent Cherki.

Squad spaces will ultimately be the diciding thing, but I would bet of it comes down to loaning out new 30m+ signings that can't be registerd in the CL vs letting Gundogan go on a free somewhere, he is gone mate.
Still provides the extra cover needed for the season. We don't want a repeat of last season's situation. Even though it is limited he still looks like he can still do a job especially in the domestic cups.
 
I recently re-watched the games against Real Madrid (23-24) and then Internazionale (24-25) and it was evident then that Rodri was already struggling to get back when we lost possession in the opponent’s half, and that was before he suffered his season-ending injury. That’s not criticism, merely acknowledging where we have a vulnerability. Gonzalez, for all his other attributes, is not quick. We’ve seen us lose possession in games and his first instinct is to grab the player and take the booking, because he knows he’s not catching them. Porto fans came on here and cautioned us about that side of his game, no pun intended. The new defenders might help, though there’s currently no guarantee they’ll all remain. Our squad is now much stronger, but every side has a weakness, and if the opposition deliberately sets the trap and dispossess us in front of its own box, it knows that 5 players running at pace will rapidly expose our defence.

As I’ve said, we’ll be comparatively comfortable domestically, but in Europe, I expect Barcelona, PSG, and Real Madrid, teams blessed with multiple fast players, to expose that vulnerability. Our cause isn’t helped by the fact that we’ll likely face them after the domestic season has taken its toll.
True but I wouldn't expect any of the 3 teams above to play that way (defending deep and counter)
 
A point that is often overlooked is that many of the players slated for the departure gate on here (Ake, Akanji, Gundogan, Stones, Kovacic) are guys that have taken the injections and played through pain and injuries for us. They might just feel that the club owes them and that now they’re fit and well, they don’t want to be forced out.

If this turns out to be the case and they all stay, then the winter window is going to have been like Christmas Eve shopping as the bells chime five.
Another point that is overlooked is this is professional football at the highest level. Clubs can, but often don't, keep a sick note or has been because of what they have done in the past. They are looking towards and building for the future.

Being available is an asset, not dissimilar from pace, passing ability, vision and etc. If you are rarely available the rest doesn't mean much.

All of these players are grown men. They have been around the game a long time. They know how things are done. They may want something from a club, and frankly who's to say you are correct in what they think, but they likely know the club doesn't have to do them any favours. They are paid handsomely. That is their reward for the things you mentioned. They are owed nothing else.

I appreciate them being good servants to the club and helping this club become what it currently is but nobody owes them anything besides our gratitude, in my opinion.
 
I think we just perceive reject differently. For me it is just a player we deem not good enough for us. They could still be a very good top league player. I think Callum Doyle is similar example clearly a talented footballer but he will probably reach his peak at mid table PL side.

Lavia and Palmer clearly had the ability to play for us they were impatient or we were not trusting enough in them.

We have rarely got it wrong when shipping out young players (rejecting). The only time I feel we lost out is when they wanted/forced the move Lavia, Palmer, Brahim Diaz, olise, gittens, and sancho.
Always find olise and gittens interesting bring quoted. Olise was here a very short time and left as he was homesick. Gittens no one knew anything about - was certainly not the best in the academy at the time. But then look where people like Ndala and the lad that went to Ajax are now

Rogers is in that bracket too
 
Always find olise and gittens interesting bring quoted. Olise was here a very short time and left as he was homesick. Gittens no one knew anything about - was certainly not the best in the academy at the time. But then look where people like Ndala and the lad that went to Ajax are now

Rogers is in that bracket too
Gittens was one we wanted to keep and really talented.

Olise was restless he moved between academies

Ndala had other issues

Rogers is talented but I still don’t see him in the same bracket as Diaz, Foden, Sancho. I don’t think he is good enough/suited for us same as Frimpong.
 
I recently re-watched the games against Real Madrid (23-24) and then Internazionale (24-25) and it was evident then that Rodri was already struggling to get back when we lost possession in the opponent’s half, and that was before he suffered his season-ending injury. That’s not criticism, merely acknowledging where we have a vulnerability. Gonzalez, for all his other attributes, is not quick. We’ve seen us lose possession in games and his first instinct is to grab the player and take the booking, because he knows he’s not catching them. Porto fans came on here and cautioned us about that side of his game, no pun intended. The new defenders might help, though there’s currently no guarantee they’ll all remain. Our squad is now much stronger, but every side has a weakness, and if the opposition deliberately sets the trap and dispossess us in front of its own box, it knows that 5 players running at pace will rapidly expose our defence.

As I’ve said, we’ll be comparatively comfortable domestically, but in Europe, I expect Barcelona, PSG, and Real Madrid, teams blessed with multiple fast players, to expose that vulnerability. Our cause isn’t helped by the fact that we’ll likely face them after the domestic season has taken its toll.
I think the idea we need legs in midfield to combat counter attacks is not the way we will go. Pep has signed Phillips not worked out he also signed Nunes whos been made a fullback. Pep likes midfielders comfortable on the ball clever players who can read a game smell the danger and deal with it early. I can't really remember 1 of his teams that had a pacey central midfield it's always been about control have 70% of the ball and it will give you a better chance of winning the game. Can't see him signing a headless chicken just because he can get back quickly if he has no positional sense and is no good at keeping the ball.
 
A glaring deficiency in our squad is the lack of pace in midfield, especially when tasked with running back to defend.

We conceded 5 goals in 13 CL games in 22/23 with "slow" Rodri and Gundo in the middle, 2 goals in 4 games vs. Bayern and Real.

The obsession with pace in midfield shows lack of understanding. Two of the greatest teams in the last 30 years, Pep's Barca 9-11and City 22-24, were "slow" in midfield.

The idea that defending against counters is mainly about running back quickly is utterly simplistic. Yes, we could do with fast runners, but there's so much more to defending, the obsession with pace is getting annoying.
 
I think the idea we need legs in midfield to combat counter attacks is not the way we will go. Pep has signed Phillips not worked out he also signed Nunes whos been made a fullback. Pep likes midfielders comfortable on the ball clever players who can read a game smell the danger and deal with it early. I can't really remember 1 of his teams that had a pacey central midfield it's always been about control have 70% of the ball and it will give you a better chance of winning the game. Can't see him signing a headless chicken just because he can get back quickly if he has no positional sense and is no good at keeping the ball.
I'm not calling for an athletic headless chicken (who would?), and Guardiola had Fernandinho in that position, who was no slouch. What I'm looking for is someone similar, someone with a little defensive control but who can also get back quickly and still play high-level football. Such players are incredibly rare. A few on here, myself included, have long championed Ayyoub Bouaddi at Lille. Still only 17 but ridiculously talented and blessed with all the attributes I'm talking about. If you have the time, try and watch some of his games/work.

 
We conceded 5 goals in 13 CL games in 22/23 with "slow" Rodri and Gundo in the middle, 2 goals in 4 games vs. Bayern and Real.

The obsession with pace in midfield shows lack of understanding. Two of the greatest teams in the last 30 years, Pep's Barca 9-11and City 22-24, were "slow" in midfield.

The idea that defending against counters is mainly about running back quickly is utterly simplistic. Yes, we could do with fast runners, but there's so much more to defending, the obsession with pace is getting annoying.
I don't disagree with that, but if you go back and watch the actual games I mentioned, not just the scorelines, you'll see that we were repeatedly caught up the middle and could have conceded more. Internazionale, who were themselves later creaking and dismantled by PSG, repeatedly broke on us in that way.
It's not an obsession to point out where we still have weaknesses. All teams have them. Recognising them and adding the appropriate pieces means you eliminate them, neutralise the opponent's threat, and make your chances of winning even greater.
 
I don't disagree with that, but if you go back and watch the actual games I mentioned, not just the scorelines, you'll see that we were repeatedly caught up the middle and could have conceded more. Internazionale, who were themselves later creaking and dismantled by PSG, repeatedly broke on us in that way.
It's not an obsession to point out where we still have weaknesses. All teams have them. Recognising them and adding the appropriate pieces means you eliminate them, neutralise the opponent's threat, and make your chances of winning even greater.

All teams, including the greatest ever, concede chances vs top teams. If you replace an intelligent player like prime Gundo with a quick one you may improve the team in some respects but it is likely to get much worse in other respects.

The emphasis on speed at the expense of intelligence is the main thing that clouded the judgment of many fans and they couldn't see back then that Rodri and Gundo would be a fantastic combo, let alone that Rodri would be one of the greatest defensive midfielders of all time.

There are trade-offs: the most intelligent and technically gifted midfielders are rarely quick. But their strengths offset their weaknesses. Zidane, Xavi, Platini, David Silva, Busquets, etc., weren't quick...
 
We conceded 5 goals in 13 CL games in 22/23 with "slow" Rodri and Gundo in the middle, 2 goals in 4 games vs. Bayern and Real.

The obsession with pace in midfield shows lack of understanding. Two of the greatest teams in the last 30 years, Pep's Barca 9-11and City 22-24, were "slow" in midfield.

The idea that defending against counters is mainly about running back quickly is utterly simplistic. Yes, we could do with fast runners, but there's so much more to defending, the obsession with pace is getting annoying.
I would have thought that what happened last season and the number of times teams ran through us is a better guide to what the squad needs, rather than how good the side was in the treble and four in a row years.

In our pomp we had Grealish, Gundogan, KDB, Bernado and Rodri in their prime and although De Bruyne would take risks in possession, he’d usually do it in areas that didn’t leave us too exposed. We also had Stones helping keep possession in midfield and in a lot of games we also had Walker’s pace to provide cover.

I think we’ll be taking more risks in possession this season, at least I would hope we will, and if we’re regularly playing the likes of Marmoush, Cherki, Doku and Foden then you would expect us to lose possession more frequently.

Reijnders looks very mobile, but him aside we lack mobility in midfield. If we were take someone like Gonzalez out of the squad and replace him with someone with greater athleticism then I think we’d have a better balance to our midfield.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top