Throwing money at a random striker is not within City’s business model. People were suggesting Andre Silva in the summer, he’s absolutely gash. I can’t think of any striker that would have been a guaranteed success, that is what you need when you’re spending millions on a striker that is going to lead the line for years. If it means going a year without winning the league then so be it, we can’t be wasting close to £100m on a striker that isn’t good enough.If I was in his position I'd have made it my business to source an alternative that was good enough.
That's his job not mine.
So you’d have bought a stop gap that might not improve the team and not waited for the right striker to be available, doesn’t sound like a good plan to me. Nor it seems the team of people, from the manager up to Khaldoon that have built our most successful squad over the years.We haven't got any at the moment that's the issue.
A stop gap would have improved the team in so far as at the moment we don't have a focal point, a physical presence or a clinical finisher.So you’d have bought a stop gap that might not improve the team and not waited for the right striker to be available, doesn’t sound like a good plan to me. Nor it seems the team of people, from the manager up to Khaldoon that have built our most successful squad over the years.
So you’d have bought a stop gap that might not improve the team and not waited for the right striker to be available, doesn’t sound like a good plan to me. Nor it seems the team of people, from the manager up to Khaldoon that have built our most successful squad over the years.
Surely there is someone playing somewhere not costing £100m that could lead the line for us. We put in plenty of balls yesterday that any striker worthy of the name would have gobbled upThrowing money at a random striker is not within City’s business model. People were suggesting Andre Silva in the summer, he’s absolutely gash. I can’t think of any striker that would have been a guaranteed success, that is what you need when you’re spending millions on a striker that is going to lead the line for years. If it means going a year without winning the league then so be it, we can’t be wasting close to £100m on a striker that isn’t good enough.
A stop gap would have improved the team in so far as at the moment we don't have a focal point, a physical presence or a clinical finisher.
Surely there is someone playing somewhere not costing £100m that could lead the line for us. We put in plenty of balls yesterday that any striker worthy of the name would have gobbled up
Might might not, they might disrupt our passing so we create less. They then are hard to move on blocking the right striker being bought when available, because the the money is spent or squad numbers not right. Sounds pretty much the short term planning united have followed for a few years. We look further ahead than that, we know what we want and are prepared to wait, and if we don’t win the league this year but are better long term then so be it.A stop gap would have improved the team in so far as at the moment we don't have a focal point, a physical presence or a clinical finisher.