Will do.That's ok. But for future reference one post per subforum is more than enough.
Will do.That's ok. But for future reference one post per subforum is more than enough.
Walker rarely moves into centre midfield unless there is space to run into when he has the ball. You want to disagree? As for tucking in to make a back 3, again it's hardly revolutionary, almost every team who play a back 4 play that way. Want to disagree? When Cancelo plays he plays a different role to Walker, he goes into midfield much more because he's more comfortable on the ball, and I assume is given greater licence by Pep. Do you want to explain what Walkers midfield role is? Coz I reckon you have made that one up.Maybe he was at Spurs, but under Pep, he has developed greater flexibility in his game to include central defensive and midfield roles.
He's far more than a traditional full back, and that's why he kèeps Cancelo out of the starting line-up.
Soon changed his tune.
Spot on.Yes. He's the definition on a flying fullback. He'll fly forward on an overlap and put a cross into a box. We have 3 types of fullbacks and all have their purposes. Walker is used mainly for his defence, but will go forward and put in a cross into the box. The inverted fullback like Zinch is used as an extra holding midfielder. The third is like Mendy who hugs the touchline high and wide. He creates width to let the winger come narrow and overload the side. In reality you'd want the fullback to be capable to do all 3 jobs for what the tactics require. The closest thing we have do doing it is Cancelo although he can be dodgy defensively.
How that’s made up is very important though and again I think we are seeing the press take the highest possible figure rather than the base plus milestone payments possible.
Just my view but will be interesting when we see the accounts, I don’t think it’s a straight up £100 million transfer still, I’m guessing 75 million plus £25 million in appearance, goals, league titles, cups and champions league bonus payments.
If you're not interested in replies, what's the point of posting on a forum?Sorry. I'm just interested in others peoples take on it as its rubs me the wrong way that we would give him wages like that.
I think he is interested in replies. That's why he posted it more than once.If you're not interested in replies, what's the point of posting on a forum?
I believe 5 posts is a minimum requirement for something like this for it to really gain traction ;-)I think he is interested in replies. That's why he posted it more than once.
I believe 5 posts is a minimum requirement for something like this for it to really gain traction ;-)
Or haven't got a clue, some people seem to think if it doesn't play like roberto carlos it's a shit leftback, zinc is perfect for our style, as his stats prove, however I would love a 22 year old carlos with cafu on the right :)You could replace the name Zinchenko with Kolarov in this and it would hit the spot on most points.
I sometimes wonder if some City fans simply don't like Eastern European left backs..
Also said no business aside Kane and Grealish :-) really excitedThe guy Tolmie said Grealish done on Thursday - box ticked.
He also said after that, the button will be pushed for Kane. Push that button Txiki, and push it hard.
He had a buy out clause of, £100 million. That clause was met by Manchester City.How that’s made up is very important though and again I think we are seeing the press take the highest possible figure rather than the base plus milestone payments possible.
Just my view but will be interesting when we see the accounts, I don’t think it’s a straight up £100 million transfer still, I’m guessing 75 million plus £25 million in appearance, goals, league titles, cups and champions league bonus payments.
Purslow stated it was a £100mill release clause, none of us know how that was worded in his contract. You may well be right but regardless, you can't state it as a fact. Not that I for one give a monkeys either way ;)It was a release clause though. Flat 100.
Chelsea could be the ones to help us with our next purchases. They pay 130m to Inter for Lukaku, Inter spends some of those millions on Jesus and/or Bernardo, we get squad place(s) and some millions extra for Kane(or even Messi ;-) )
was just thinking this, Inter get a replacement for Lukaku at about half the fee they received by buying Jesus for around 60-70mChelsea could be the ones to help us with our next purchases. They pay 130m to Inter for Lukaku, Inter spends some of those millions on Jesus and/or Bernardo, we get squad place(s) and some millions extra for Kane(or even Messi ;-) )
I'll be really sorry to see him leave, if he does.We don't win the league last season without Bernie.
He was immense for the last four months.
His performance away at Aston Villa is one of the finest I have seen from any City player in the last decade.
It was ten men and on a similar par to the ten man show Dave put on at Hull City.
Great player, great guy.