richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 28,093
mahrez it should be, would HATE to lose Bernardo!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jack Grealish
- Thread starter leighton
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
mahrez it should be, would HATE to lose Bernardo!
doobyedoobye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 4,905
Would be a great signing. I think Bernardo and mahrez would be the players in danger of losing their places to him.
I could imagine one of those two players being an unexpected leaver this summer..
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 17,257
mahrez it should be, would HATE to lose Bernardo!
we wouldn’t lose Bernardo. I was just thinking that’s probably where grealish would play, as he’s not really a winger and I can’t see our other midfielders getting benched
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
There was someone in this thread suspecting he’s on strike heheSeems to been injured for ages what is wrong with him?
There was someone in this thread suspecting he’s on strike hehe
well if any of the is true then the 60m buy out he wanted in his contract was put in and he signed it but now Villa ain’t sticking to it and they can do it’s not like at clubs in Europe where there is a buyout you pay it and the players yours! Here it’s not enforceable just like the Saurez buyout when Arsenal did 40m and 1p
doobyedoobye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 4,905
Seems to been injured for ages what is wrong with him?
His shins unsurprisingly
Hair in his eyes I heard.His shins unsurprisingly
Jokithedruid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2012
- Messages
- 981
well if any of the is true then the 60m buy out he wanted in his contract was put in and he signed it but now Villa ain’t sticking to it and they can do it’s not like at clubs in Europe where there is a buyout you pay it and the players yours! Here it’s not enforceable just like the Saurez buyout when Arsenal did 40m and 1p
Maybe its been decided that he leaves this summer and the manager has decided not to use him anymore. Didnt poch do that to walker when he was leaving spurs?
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
well if any of the is true then the 60m buy out he wanted in his contract was put in and he signed it but now Villa ain’t sticking to it and they can do it’s not like at clubs in Europe where there is a buyout you pay it and the players yours! Here it’s not enforceable just like the Saurez buyout when Arsenal did 40m and 1p
Don’t listen to that mouthy know-nowt, he’s got shin splints and there’s no secret in that.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.