Don’t know. But what I do know is that I’d rather have Sancho and however tens of millions we paid for Mahrez to be Winger 4 than Mahrez. Gives us more financial room for big transfers that will really improve us.
Hope we don’t make the same mistake with Foden and Isco.
They didn’t decide to let him go and sign Mahrez, each different decisions at different times Sancho refused to sign a contract and told City he wanted to leave. Maybe City courting Sanchez at the time and the players we already had, influenced Sancho in thinking his opportunity would be limited. City had no choice in allowing him to leave they got a fee and maybe some clauses in the contract. Sancho has said that a return could be possibleI can only think that Sancho must've really wanted out at City. I know there's been musings of discontent and that he really forced his way out - perhaps he burned some bridges along the way, who knows. But the decision to let him leave and bring in Mahrez increasingly looks like a massive mistake.
They didn’t decide to let him go and sign Mahrez, each different decisions at different times Sancho refused to sign a contract and told City he wanted to leave. Maybe City courting Sanchez at the time and the players we already had, influenced Sancho in thinking his opportunity would be limited. City had no choice in allowing him to leave they got a fee and maybe some clauses in the contract. Sancho has said that a return could be possible
Mans like Sanchoo dunt trak bak doe bro.Fucking useless at tracking back.
They didn’t decide to let him go and sign Mahrez, each different decisions at different times Sancho refused to sign a contract and told City he wanted to leave. Maybe City courting Sanchez at the time and the players we already had, influenced Sancho in thinking his opportunity would be limited. City had no choice in allowing him to leave they got a fee and maybe some clauses in the contract. Sancho has said that a return could be possible