mike channon´s windmill said:
Has to start scoring as he did at Villa. There he seemed to make all the right choices and his finishing was clinical. At City he´s been too anxious to impress so now after a full season he needs to relax and take the pressure off himself. If he does this we´ll have a player
I hadn't thought about it this way before, but I agree with you. He does seem to be trying too hard, which affects his decision-making. It's similar to the problem that Dzeko was having in his first few months: he's trying to do everything all at once to impress the manager, thinking about it too much, instead of playing instinctively. We might see a much more effective James Milner this season.
That said, I don't think he'll ever look
quite right in the team. Mancini's strategy in central midfield seems to be to combine strong, positionally aware defensive midfielders (Barry, De Jong), and technically gifted attacking midfielders (Silva, Yaya, and hence the pursuit for Nasri). Milner doesn't really fall into either category. His positional awareness isn't good enough for a defensive midfielder; he lacks the ingenuity and quick feet to be a truly effective attacking midfielder in our system.
I've read somewhere that in our unusual transfer policy system, Milner was pushed through mainly by Marwood (in contrast, Kolarov was pushed through mainly by Mancini, so this isn't necessarily a defence of Mancini or a criticism of Marwood!). This makes sense to me, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's
some truth to it. Compared to the other central midfield targets we've been linked with (Gago, Nasri, De Rossi?), Milner just feels like an odd fit for the direction our style of play seems to be heading.
I'm not saying that Milner won't be useful this season. He's a good player. I thought that he played well in the middle last season,
but only when we were playing 4-4-2 rather than 4-2-3-1, a point which many other posters seemed to miss. He ran the show in a couple of Europa League games when we played 4-4-2, but I felt he was underwhelming whenever he was played as part of the '2' or the '3' in Mancini's usual formation.
For that reason, I can't help but agree with the article, to some extent: he'll be a very good asset to deploy in Cup games where Mancini feels as though he can shift to a 4-4-2, sure; unfortunately for Milner, I find it hard to believe that the presence of a more technically gifted central midfielder (whether as part of the '2' or the '3') in his place wouldn't significantly lift the team's performance levels.