Puppet Master Silva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 2,787
MeatHunterrr said:Don't know but im not buying this "lack of game time", unless he expects to be regular starter at City. If he expects that, then he is way unrealistic. He had enough game time last season. Over 40 appearances in a double winning team.KnaresboroughBlue said:OB1 said:The only reason for Milner not to sign a new contract is financial.
If City are asking him to take a real pay cut then he would have cause not to sign the contract; otherwise it is a case of him wanting a big signing on fee when he leaves on a free.
If Milner had a longer term contract but felt he needed to leave to get more game time, City would, IMO, let him go so long as they got a fair fee. Milner wants that fee for himself or maybe his charity but, regardless, he is currently preventing City from capitalising fully on the value of his registration. That is bad for MCFC.
He signed a contract and to the best of my knowledge he has honoured that contract as have we. He is fully entitled to not sign another contract if he believes that it would be against his best interests to do so. Reasons could be financial (as you state), a lack of playing time (as he states) or something else entirely (wanting to play abroad/fancying a fresh challenge/change of scenery etc).
I believe it is likely to be due to a perceived lack of playing time. This is what he has said himself and I see no reason for him to be dishonest about it. Any of the other reasons are perfectly acceptable, so why lie about it?
He started 12 matches last season. 12.