samharris said:
TheSituation said:
He's a top class striker, simple as. His movement and striker's instincts are the best around.
Strikers instincts ?? all strikers have good instincts even the ones not playing for the scum thats why he has more chances.. if he played for say Newcastle would he still come good. ??Shearer was a good striker, took penalties, free kicks took players on and beat em..scored shitloads.. shittyrita goal hangs and scores mainly tap ins..
please dont make him out to be better than he is..lets see next season after everyone knows the right way to deal with him..He hangs on to the last man cos he knows he cant dribble around him so he goes for the old sprint finish, thats if hes not offside.
Lol. Players like Inzaghi and Raul score goals too, in exactly the same fashion, but I doubt you dislike them. Would Hernandez score fewer goals at Newcastle? Yes. Would Inzaghi? Yes. Does that matter? No. Why? Because they're fucking good at scoring goals when put in a good side, that's the whole point. Man Utd are a good side, so give them a striker who scores goals in a good side and what do you get? Goals. Yes. Are you following? Would you advise Man Utd to sign players who don't score as many goals for them but would score more if they went to Newcastle?!
Such a moronic argument that only people with limited understanding of football would subscribe to.
P.s. Tevez scores a lot of these scrappy, instinctive goals, and his movement at times is very similar to Hernandez's, but that doesn't matter, 'cos he's a City player.