I thought that the people were sovereign and mps were elected representatives who can be removed if they don't do the job that their constituents have tasked them with.
I must have missed something somewhere.
You have, clearly.
I thought that the people were sovereign and mps were elected representatives who can be removed if they don't do the job that their constituents have tasked them with.
I must have missed something somewhere.
That’s Liam Fox.
I thought that the people were sovereign and mps were elected representatives who can be removed if they don't do the job that their constituents have tasked them with.
I must have missed something somewhere.
The people are only sovereign at a General election, after the election Parliament is where sovereignty resides.
Parliament "lend" sovereignty to the people for one day and one day only.
It's an interesting argument this and its seemingly dependant on who is in power and opposition as to what answer you get.
The SNP for instance in Westminster constantly tell us that the sovereign power rests with the people.
Up here in Scotland where they are in charge you don't here that line so much from them.
Isn’t it the same as for the U.K. though. The people of Scotland would only have sovereignty on the day of an election for the Scottish Parliament or Westminster, or on the day of a referendum. So when the SNP talk about sovereignty lies with the people of Scotland, that can only be when a referendum is granted, on the day of that referendum. I would have thought that if Westminster refused a second Indy ref then the matter would play out in the high courts of both Scotland and England.The SNP muddy the issue because they want a referendum and independence which in effect I suppose would mean handing sovereignty to themselves and taking it away from Westminster. So in that case they are both right and wrong. If they achieved independence and settled for a system like the one we currently have then sovereignty would then revert to the Scottish Parliament but like the UK that sovereignty would be handed to the Scottish people at a General election.
I think.
Isn’t it the same as for the U.K. though. The people of Scotland would only have sovereignty on the day of an election for the Scottish Parliament or Westminster, or on the day of a referendum. So when the SNP talk about sovereignty lies with the people of Scotland, that can only be when a referendum is granted, on the day of that referendum. I would have thought that if Westminster refused a second Indy ref then the matter would play out in the high courts of both Scotland and England.
The opposition parties agree to pursue forming a government with Corbyn as PM for 2 weeks with the objective of seeking an extension then calling a GE. The people then have the choice of going full hard Brexit or a deal with peoples referendum to ratify or reject. Apart from one...
Swinson is enabling Boris and his shower of cunts rather than act in the nations interest.
The opposition parties agree to pursue forming a government with Corbyn as PM for 2 weeks with the objective of seeking an extension then calling a GE. The people then have the choice of going full hard Brexit or a deal with peoples referendum to ratify or reject. Apart from one...
Swinson is enabling Boris and his shower of cunts rather than act in the nations interest.
Any further proof needed she's a Boris babe?
Has Chukka fucked off already?
Yellow Tories.
The lib dems number of MPs are now 25% tories and led by a closet tory