jimharri
Moderator
Absolute rubbish....no way Juventus would value Danilo the same as Cancelo.
Absolute rubbish....no way Juventus would value Danilo the same as Cancelo.
LolAbsolute rubbish....no way Juventus would value Danilo the same as Cancelo. Many Juventus fans also can't believe that Cancelo is being valued at only 27.5 million...it's a great deal for City.
Genuinely, how does this deal get documented officially?
Does it go down as us paying £55m for Cancelo and Juve giving us £27.5m for Danilo or do we effectively cancel Danilo's contract?
Think that's it and then we can put a £27.5m sale on our accounts whilst the Cancelo fee gets amortised? I'm not too sure though.Genuinely, how does this deal get documented officially?
Does it go down as us paying £55m for Cancelo and Juve giving us £27.5m for Danilo or do we effectively cancel Danilo's contract?
Yeah, I was just having a go. I looked forward to Koli spotting up on the left for a belting free kick and Clichmeister had some good spells.Kolarov was fine when used solely as an attacking full back with GazBaz covering him. Mancini got a serious tune out of Clichy in a purely defensive full back role. The lads we have now are much better and more akin to the Zaba/Richards switch around (pre the injuries Micah suffered and his strange obsession with bulking up) but with more stylistic differences. Cancelo is a top class attacking fullback that can drift into any attacking position and do damage, Walker is a defensive brick wall. Both Micah and Zaba had a bit of both but were top quality. What we'll have now is more focused and tactically useful quality.
As long as the whole deal isnt cancell-o-ed I'll take whatever.All this math is making be dizzy. Is it canilo or dancelo?
Genuinely, how does this deal get documented officially?
Does it go down as us paying £55m for Cancelo and Juve giving us £27.5m for Danilo or do we effectively cancel Danilo's contract?
We'll book a profit of £11m on the Danilo sale (sale price minus book value after amortization) and we'll add around £11m in amortization to the accounts for Cancelo, while removing Danilo's c £5.5m amortization. £5.5m positive effect for this financial year with an increase of £5.5m to amortization costs per annum going forwards for the next 2 years and £11m after that.Think that's it and then we can put a £27.5m sale on our accounts whilst the Cancelo fee gets amortised? I'm not too sure though.
We'll book a profit of £11m on the Danilo sale (sale price minus book value after amortization) and we'll add around £11m in amortization to the accounts for Cancelo, while removing Danilo's c £5.5m amortization. £5.5m positive effect for this financial year with an increase of £5.5m to amortization costs per annum going forwards for the next 2 years and £11m after that.
Am now totally confused about the points being made on Cancelo. If that guy is saying the deal is worth around 55M and it's based on 27.5 each for the two players then the point I wanted to make was that I think Cancelo is worth more than Danilo. Also surprised to see that Juventus valued Cancelo at only 27.5M.
He's worth twice as much as him.Am now totally confused about the points being made on Cancelo. If that guy is saying the deal is worth around 55M and it's based on 27.5 each for the two players then the point I wanted to make was that I think Cancelo is worth more than Danilo. Also surprised to see that Juventus valued Cancelo at only 27.5M.
Am now totally confused about the points being made on Cancelo. If that guy is saying the deal is worth around 55M and it's based on 27.5 each for the two players then the point I wanted to make was that I think Cancelo is worth more than Danilo. Also surprised to see that Juventus valued Cancelo at only 27.5M.
It's 3 pm in Turin now, that must be the reason there's no announcement - send him back with our 27m in his pocket then.Would be typical City if Danilo fails his medical.