3 at the back allows us to play with an extra striker. 5 nil drubbing of Liverpool.Whenever he played this season it was in a 4.
Why would we play 3 at the back now when the ball is on the edge of the opponent's box 70% of the time?
It takes away an added attacking player.
Played 3 at the back against Huddersfield, no right back.When last season?
I've seen City dropping into a back three at the back many times within one game never mind starting with a back 3.When last season?
Must confess to never seeing this lad play? I gather he’s an attacking fullback? Plenty of pace?
What sort of fee is being mooted, I’m not going to google it as I assume it will be a load of fictional astronomical figures.
Looked to me like a technically gifted player. Good passing, good dribbling skills and nice crossing ability. Pace seems pretty standard for an attacking fullback.
Must confess to never seeing this lad play? I gather he’s an attacking fullback? Plenty of pace?
What sort of fee is being mooted, I’m not going to google it as I assume it will be a load of fictional astronomical figures.
Por quoi?Still think this is very suspect.
Yeah but without the red card we’d have lost 4-0. /Sky5-0 vs Liverpool comes to mind with Stones, Ota and Danilo at the back with Walker and Mendy playing as wing backs