Didsbury Dave said:
Didn't both Stephen Bowler and Greenalls back him unconditionally, and they were the majority?
Also, when he was finally ousted, one of his long term lapdogs finally turned on him and he lost a vote of confidence at his house 3-2. To his dismay he was finished at that moment and forward came Franny to "save" us.
Was that Chris Muir? Or Freddie Pye?
I may be wrong, but I thought the vote was the board approval of the sale of Swales's and Boler's shares to Mike McDonald. Again, subject to anyone knowing better, the story was that Swales had supposedly decided he had no alternative but to sell but the sentiment among the dissenting directors being that support for Franny among the fans was so great that the only option at that stage was a takeover from him.
The board at that point was composed pretty much entirely of Swales loyalists so the fact he lost the vote was a fatal blow to him, really. The cynic in me tends to think that the directors who voted for Lee were really angline to preserve their role at the club more than anything. I think that Ian Niven, from memory, survived on the board after Lee became chairman. IIRC, Lee's camp had four directors, while there were three non-Lee people: one was Ashley Lewis (Boler's man), one was Andrew Thomas of Greenalls and I think there was also Niven.
I used to know all this chapter and verse for professional reasons but those days are long gone, so my memory isn't what it used to be. It's also half eleven on Friday evening where I am and I'm pissed. But if the Central Library microfiche files are still there and anyone can be arsed, look at the MEN in the first week or two of December 1993 and you'll find out about the board vote and the first week or two of February 1994 will reveal the post-takeover board changes.
As for the other historical stuff, Boler bought into City when the club had a GBP 750K share issue sometime around 1985 to bring in money without which Swales would have to sell up. Swales subscribed for some of the shares, but Boler for most. I'm not sure if Boler was even interested in having board representation until Franny took over - he was effectively propping up Swales. Considering the financial climate in football in the early nineties and the fact that Swales was an utter dinosaur in relative terms (we got a GBP 60K flat fee for the outsourcing of our merchandising in the same year that Newcastle's operation turned over GBP 6 million) I've never understood why Boler supported Swales for so long.
Greenalls had around 20% of the club at one point. They also had the exclusive right to sell their piss poor beer in the stadium and social club. Their shareholding was aimed at preserving that commercial benefit and they didn't give a shit about any internal club affairs.