John Stones

[Shaelumstash]

Ok. I don't hold the position stats show you everything

That will do for me, mate.

 

[fatbloke]

Wrong about what? I know it your natural inclination to side with anything opposing my view. But what exactly was I wrong about in my discussion with Shael?

And as far as not admitting wrong, you probably should stop protecting :)

I didn't actually say you were wrong did I, it was just a friendly little dig!! ;)

 

[Dax777]

I didn't actually say you were wrong did I, it was just a friendly little dig!! ;)

Ah! My bad. See what I did there ;p

 

[TonyM]

Maybe this was the new agent?

?

 

[fatbloke]

Ah! My bad. See what I did there ;p

Fail trying to mask your insecurity? ;)

 

[Dax777]

Fail trying to mask your insecurity? ;)

Nope. Just proving you wrong without trying :)

 

[fatbloke]

Nope. Just proving you wrong without trying :)

Shame it didn't work, you should try harder next time!! ;)

 

[Eric Wirral]

My View is simple. I would rather see Denayer given a chance than buy Stones. There is nothing I have seen in Stones that thinks we should spunk a load of money on him and cost Denayer his place in the squad. Sky, BT, BBC all failed to point out his mistakes and openly w**k over every average thing he does.

 

[Dax777]

Shame it didn't work, you should try harder next time!! ;)

I will. Fuck, I did it again :)

 

[Dax777]

My View is simple. I would rather see Denayer given a chance than buy Stones. There is nothing I have seen in Stones that thinks we should spunk a load of money on him and cost Denayer his place in the squad. Sky, BT, BBC all failed to point out his mistakes and openly w**k over every average thing he does.

What if it doesn't cost Denayer his place?