oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Does it actually say that, £50M and Bony for Stones ?£50 million plus Stones, for Bony.... F*ck that. Scouse Scooges can just piss off
Does it actually say that, £50M and Bony for Stones ?£50 million plus Stones, for Bony.... F*ck that. Scouse Scooges can just piss off
Does it actually say that, £50M and Bony for Stones ?
No mate it doesn't, I was just being a bit facetious :-)Does it actually say that, £50M and Bony for Stones ?
Aye he is yea, he's better at being foreign that's about itThe thing is Koulibaly is better than Stones
Koeman wants Bony to "sweeten the deal". Well it would certainly do that!Mirror running a story that Koeman wants Bony in part ex
Does it actually say that, £50M and Bony for Stones ?
So the Mirror is running a separate big splash that Koeman is already at odds with the board? Silly question really, that would only apply if it was us selling Stones.No mate it doesn't, I was just being a bit facetious :-)
Just says Koeman wants Bony as part of any possible deal, but the Everton board aren't keen, and only want a straight, £50 million, cash deal. Remember though it is the Mirror were talking about here, so odds on it's all complete b*llocks
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/ronald-koeman-meets-manchester-city-8435844
We didn't pay too much for Bony by a long shot regardless of how it worked out for him here. If there's any truth in the rumour he'll do well at Everton if this swap is true.Seems a good enough deal to take if it includes them picking up the difference in his wages rather than us. Bony is worth whatever someone is prepared to pay us and clubs are not exactly beating down our doors from what I can see.
Bony is just one in a series of players we paid spectacularly too much for and we aren't going to be able to recoup more than a fraction, especially when they will be on high salaries here. There are going to be a lot of bullet biting if we have to free up slots for new signings.