TFC
Well-Known Member
Some act like we have a divine right to sign a player. If the selling club want to play hard to maximise their fee, that's their perogitive.
Wish we'd do a little bit more of it to be honest.
Some act like we have a divine right to sign a player. If the selling club want to play hard to maximise their fee, that's their perogitive.
It is their prerogative. They could have identified targets, and put deals in place, but instead they adopt a sitting duck strategy of setting a price for their players. They might extract huge fees, but I don't think from a footballing point of view it was the best strategy, seeing as they are not sure of a few millions themselves. What do they do if City do decide to pay up? Celebrate the £50m, or worry that they have no defence left.Some act like we have a divine right to sign a player. If the selling club want to play hard to maximise their fee, that's their perogitive.
Our players get ripped to shreds like Mangala and Sterling. Chelsea use the transfer mkt as a way of making money. Each season they make big signings, but are also able to sell players, whereas City are rarely able to do so. There have been some exceptions eg Rodwell.Wish we'd do a little bit more of it to be honest.
Everton wanted Hart - I'd have done that deal - £40m they were willing to pay.
Whether Hart would have gone for it...
It'd be decent business that. Let them have Bony for £25m and Mangala for £20m then if they get the £75m for Lukaku they've covered both outgoings and got a top keeper thrown in for good measure.Everton wanted Hart - I'd have done that deal - £40m they were willing to pay.
Whether Hart would have gone for it...
Well then we wouldn't have a recognised top level keeper and Hart would clearly not leave us to go to Everton unless he was told he would be No2 no matter what and eeeeeeeeeeeven then I cant imagine he wouldn't go to EvertonEverton wanted Hart - I'd have done that deal - £40m they were willing to pay.
Whether Hart would have gone for it...
So the club said no?Everton wanted Hart - I'd have done that deal - £40m they were willing to pay.
Whether Hart would have gone for it...
It's a bit disingenuous saying "according to here"So the club said no?
But Pep wants rid of Joe according to here?
Then, like every other fan who sits near me and slags the lad off, you'd be sat there saying, 'God, wish we still had Joey, this lads shite'Everton wanted Hart - I'd have done that deal - £40m they were willing to pay.
Whether Hart would have gone for it...
So the club said no?
But Pep wants rid of Joe according to here?
Then, like every other fan who sits near me and slags the lad off, you'd be sat there saying, 'God, wish we still had Joey, this lads shite'
There are literally 3 keepers in the world were genuine arguments can be made that are better and none are available.
Well then we wouldn't have a recognised top level keeper and Hart would clearly not leave us to go to Everton unless he was told he would be No2 no matter what and eeeeeeeeeeeven then I cant imagine he wouldn't go to Everton
Also that would mean the club value him at £10 million which is probably about half of what they could actually get for him
Other than that though its a terrible idea
Isn't just his distribution though.Maybe the point Tolmie is making about Joe is that Everton were active in the transfer mkt and he was just using hart as an example.
I am glad we showed faith in hart. If he has a problem with his distribution then he can work on it.
It was reported not that long ago that Pep wanted rid of Joe but the higher ups at club wanted him to stay and convinced Pep to try and work with him.
So the club said no?
But Pep wants rid of Joe according to here?
I can't accept that.
I can imagine Pep coming to that decision himself, but not being persuaded to by the bosses. I don't think they would give a shit either way.
I think both our keepers are on thin ice personally.