John Stones

[HaalandEffect]

We’ve already loaned them Harrison so pretty sure the new rules mean Leeds will have to cough up if they want Stones

Wich new rule?

 

[bumbleblue]

Wich new rule?

That a club can only loan one player from a parent club. Eg they already have Harrison so they couldn’t have Stones on loan at same time.

 

[skyblues]

Not a single report linking him to another club?...

 

[LongsightM13]

Wich new rule?

I think you can only loan one player to any other club, not sure if its only the Premier League or applies throughout England as a whole

How many loans are allowed for Premier League clubs?

Find out how Premier League clubs are limited in the number of players they can bring in on loan from English clubs

www.premierleague.com

 

[Father Paul]

I

If Stones is happy to be part of the squad, I’d keep him. His stock isn’t the highest at the moment and he could easily settle back in to some good form. One player we should absolutely be getting rid of is Otamendi, who is a complete liability in this setup.

I had a dream the other night that Stones started the first game was a permanent fixture and won player of the year. Madness or what?

 

[BamberBridgeBlue]

I

I had a dream the other night that Stones started the first game was a permanent fixture and won player of the year. Madness or what?

Nurse! Nurse! He’s out of bed again!

 

[Nick L]

Attention seeker ::::::: John Stones. My AR .S

 

[Dr Jacoby]

I

I had a dream the other night that Stones started the first game was a permanent fixture and won player of the year. Madness or what?

Which team was he playing for? New York?

 

[Ric]

As things stand, he’s probably 3rd/4th choice centre-half for next season. Not completely implausible that he could still play a part.

 

[malg]

I'm in the minority then as I'd keep him.